From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page()
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 20:28:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220513202819.829591-12-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513202819.829591-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Get the kvm pointer from the caller, rather than deriving it from
vcpu->kvm, and plumb the kvm pointer all the way from
kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(). With this change in place, the vcpu pointer
is only needed to sync indirect shadow pages. In other words,
__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page() can now be used to get *direct* shadow pages
without a vcpu pointer. This enables eager page splitting, which needs
to allocate direct shadow pages during VM ioctls.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 9cc73c3453c3..cf27c5de9dc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2001,7 +2001,8 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte)
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte));
}
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
gfn_t gfn,
struct hlist_head *sp_list,
union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
@@ -2011,7 +2012,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int collisions = 0;
LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
- for_each_valid_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp, sp_list) {
+ for_each_valid_sp(kvm, sp, sp_list) {
if (sp->gfn != gfn) {
collisions++;
continue;
@@ -2028,7 +2029,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* upper-level page will be write-protected.
*/
if (role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K && sp->unsync)
- kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp,
+ kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp,
&invalid_list);
continue;
}
@@ -2056,7 +2057,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&invalid_list));
if (ret > 0)
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
@@ -2065,13 +2066,13 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
sp = NULL;
- ++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
+ ++kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
out:
- kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, &invalid_list);
+ kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(kvm, &invalid_list);
- if (collisions > vcpu->kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions)
- vcpu->kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions = collisions;
+ if (collisions > kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions)
+ kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions = collisions;
return sp;
}
@@ -2115,7 +2116,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
return sp;
}
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct shadow_page_caches *caches,
gfn_t gfn,
union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
@@ -2124,12 +2126,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
bool created = false;
- sp_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)];
+ sp_list = &kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)];
- sp = kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, sp_list, role);
+ sp = kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(kvm, vcpu, gfn, sp_list, role);
if (!sp) {
created = true;
- sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu->kvm, caches, gfn, sp_list, role);
+ sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(kvm, caches, gfn, sp_list, role);
}
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, created);
@@ -2146,7 +2148,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
.gfn_array_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_gfn_array_cache,
};
- return __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, &caches, gfn, role);
+ return __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, &caches, gfn, role);
}
static union kvm_mmu_page_role kvm_mmu_child_role(u64 *sptep, bool direct, u32 access)
--
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 20:27 [PATCH v5 00/21] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:27 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-05-16 6:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-16 21:38 ` David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Always pass 0 for @quadrant when gptes are 8 bytes David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-05-15 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-05-16 3:31 ` Anup Patel
2022-05-16 23:23 ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 14:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 16:39 ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 17:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-13 20:28 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220513202819.829591-12-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox