From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/4] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on diag 308
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:56:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220517115607.3252157-5-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517115607.3252157-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Test that key-controlled protection does not apply to diag 308.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/skey.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c
index 60ae8158..c2d28ffd 100644
--- a/s390x/skey.c
+++ b/s390x/skey.c
@@ -285,6 +285,31 @@ static void test_store_cpu_address(void)
report_prefix_pop();
}
+static void test_diag_308(void)
+{
+ uint16_t response;
+ uint32_t (*ipib)[1024] = (void *)pagebuf;
+
+ report_prefix_push("DIAG 308");
+ (*ipib)[0] = 0; /* Invalid length */
+ set_storage_key(ipib, 0x28, 0);
+ /* key-controlled protection does not apply */
+ asm volatile (
+ "lr %%r2,%[ipib]\n\t"
+ "spka 0x10\n\t"
+ "diag %%r2,%[code],0x308\n\t"
+ "spka 0\n\t"
+ "lr %[response],%%r3\n"
+ : [response] "=d" (response)
+ : [ipib] "d" (ipib),
+ [code] "d" (5)
+ : "%r2", "%r3"
+ );
+ report(response == 0x402, "no exception on fetch, response: invalid IPIB");
+ set_storage_key(ipib, 0x00, 0);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
/*
* Perform CHANNEL SUBSYSTEM CALL (CHSC) instruction while temporarily executing
* with access key 1.
@@ -714,6 +739,7 @@ int main(void)
test_chg();
test_test_protection();
test_store_cpu_address();
+ test_diag_308();
test_channel_subsystem_call();
setup_vm();
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 11:56 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/4] More skey instr. emulation test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 11:56 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: Fix sclp facility bit numbers Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 11:56 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/4] s390x: Test TEID values in storage key test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 13:46 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-17 15:11 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 15:32 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-17 11:56 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/4] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some more instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 13:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-17 15:34 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 11:56 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2022-05-17 14:52 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/4] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on diag 308 Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-17 15:47 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220517115607.3252157-5-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox