From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu SVE/SME flags to the state flag set
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:28:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220610092838.1205755-11-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610092838.1205755-1-maz@kernel.org>
The two HOST_{SVE,SME}_ENABLED are only used for the host kernel
to track its own state across a vcpu run so that it can be fully
restored.
Move these flags to the so called state set.
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++---
arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4c7446400b77..4f147bdc5ce9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -515,6 +515,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
/* Save TRBE context if active */
#define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(6))
+/* SVE enabled for host EL0 */
+#define HOST_SVE_ENABLED __vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(0))
+/* SME enabled for EL0 */
+#define HOST_SME_ENABLED __vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(1))
+
/* Pointer to the vcpu's SVE FFR for sve_{save,load}_state() */
#define vcpu_sve_pffr(vcpu) (kern_hyp_va((vcpu)->arch.sve_state) + \
sve_ffr_offset((vcpu)->arch.sve_max_vl))
@@ -536,11 +541,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
})
/* vcpu_arch flags field values: */
-#define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED (1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */
#define KVM_ARM64_ON_UNSUPPORTED_CPU (1 << 15) /* Physical CPU not in supported_cpus */
-#define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SME_ENABLED (1 << 16) /* SME enabled for EL0 */
#define KVM_ARM64_WFIT (1 << 17) /* WFIT instruction trapped */
-
#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index d397efe1a378..557a96f8e06a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.fp_state = FP_STATE_HOST_OWNED;
- vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED;
+ vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN)
- vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED;
+ vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
/*
* We don't currently support SME guests but if we leave
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* operations. Do this for ZA as well for now for simplicity.
*/
if (system_supports_sme()) {
- vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_HOST_SME_ENABLED;
+ vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, HOST_SME_ENABLED);
if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_SMEN_EL0EN)
- vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SME_ENABLED;
+ vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, HOST_SME_ENABLED);
if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_SVCR) & (SVCR_SM_MASK | SVCR_ZA_MASK)) {
vcpu->arch.fp_state = FP_STATE_FREE;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
if (has_vhe() && system_supports_sme()) {
/* Also restore EL0 state seen on entry */
- if (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_HOST_SME_ENABLED)
+ if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, HOST_SME_ENABLED))
sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, 0,
CPACR_EL1_SMEN_EL0EN |
CPACR_EL1_SMEN_EL1EN);
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* for EL0. To avoid spurious traps, restore the trap state
* seen by kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp():
*/
- if (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED)
+ if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED))
sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, 0, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN);
else
sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN, 0);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 9:28 [PATCH v2 00/19] KVM/arm64: Refactoring the vcpu flags Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] KVM: arm64: Always start with clearing SVE flag on load Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] KVM: arm64: Always start with clearing SME " Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] KVM: arm64: Drop FP_FOREIGN_STATE from the hypervisor code Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] KVM: arm64: Move FP state ownership from flag to a tristate Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to manipulate vcpu flags among a set Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 13:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-06-11 18:37 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-06-12 8:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] KVM: arm64: Add three sets of flags to the vcpu state Marc Zyngier
2022-06-11 18:41 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu configuration flags into their own set Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu PC/Exception flags to the input flag set Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu debug/SPE/TRBE " Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu ON_UNSUPPORTED_CPU flag to the state " Marc Zyngier
2022-06-15 13:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-06-15 13:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] KVM: arm64: Move vcpu WFIT " Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] KVM: arm64: Kill unused vcpu flags field Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] KVM: arm64: Convert vcpu sysregs_loaded_on_cpu to a state flag Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] KVM: arm64: Warn when PENDING_EXCEPTION and INCREMENT_PC are set together Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] KVM: arm64: Add build-time sanity checks for flags Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] KVM: arm64: Reduce the size of the vcpu flag members Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] KVM: arm64: Document why pause cannot be turned into a flag Marc Zyngier
2022-06-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] KVM: arm64: Move the handling of !FP outside of the fast path Marc Zyngier
2022-06-14 4:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-06-29 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] KVM/arm64: Refactoring the vcpu flags Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220610092838.1205755-11-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox