Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Kechen Lu <kechenl@nvidia.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
	vkuznets@redhat.com, somduttar@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: x86: Let userspace re-enable previously disabled exits
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:51:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615025114.GB7808@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615011622.136646-5-kechenl@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 06:16:19PM -0700, Kechen Lu wrote:
>From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
>Add an OVERRIDE flag to KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS allow userspace to
>re-enable exits and/or override previous settings.  There's no real use
>case for the the per-VM ioctl, but a future per-vCPU variant wants to let
>userspace toggle interception while the vCPU is running; add the OVERRIDE
>functionality now to provide consistent between between the per-VM and
>per-vCPU variants.
>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst |  5 +++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c             | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h       |  4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>index d0d8749591a8..89e13b6783b5 100644
>--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>@@ -6941,6 +6941,7 @@ Valid bits in args[0] are::
>   #define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT              (1 << 1)
>   #define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE            (1 << 2)
>   #define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_CSTATE           (1 << 3)
>+  #define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_OVERRIDE         (1ull << 63)
> 
> Enabling this capability on a VM provides userspace with a way to no
> longer intercept some instructions for improved latency in some
>@@ -6949,6 +6950,10 @@ physical CPUs.  More bits can be added in the future; userspace can
> just pass the KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION result to KVM_ENABLE_CAP to disable
> all such vmexits.
> 
>+By default, this capability only disables exits.  To re-enable an exit, or to
>+override previous settings, userspace can set KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_OVERRIDE,
>+in which case KVM will enable/disable according to the mask (a '1' == disable).
>+
> Do not enable KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if you disable HLT exits.
> 
> 7.14 KVM_CAP_S390_HPAGE_1M
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>index f31ebbb1b94f..7cc8ac550bc7 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>@@ -4201,11 +4201,10 @@ static inline bool kvm_can_mwait_in_guest(void)
> 
> static u64 kvm_get_allowed_disable_exits(void)
> {
>-	u64 r = KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT | KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE |
>-		KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_CSTATE;
>+	u64 r = KVM_X86_DISABLE_VALID_EXITS;
> 
>-	if(kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
>-		r |= KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT;
>+	if (!kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
>+		r &= ~KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT;

This hunk looks like a fix to patch 3; it can be squashed into that patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15  1:16 [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: x86: add per-vCPU exits disable capability Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: x86: only allow exits disable before vCPUs created Kechen Lu
2022-07-20 17:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 17:49     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-20 18:38       ` Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] KVM: x86: Move *_in_guest power management flags to vCPU scope Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] KVM: x86: Reject disabling of MWAIT interception when not allowed Kechen Lu
2022-07-20 17:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: x86: Let userspace re-enable previously disabled exits Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  2:51   ` Chao Gao [this message]
2022-07-20 17:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86: add vCPU scoped toggling for " Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  2:43   ` Chao Gao
2022-06-16  3:04     ` Kechen Lu
2022-07-20 17:38     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: x86: Add a new guest_debug flag forcing exit to userspace Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: selftests: Add tests for VM and vCPU cap KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS Kechen Lu
2022-06-15  3:14   ` Chao Gao
2022-06-15 18:21     ` Kechen Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615025114.GB7808@gao-cwp \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kechenl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=somduttar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox