From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
fiuczy@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v20 07/20] s390/vfio-ap: rename matrix_dev->lock mutex to matrix_dev->mdevs_lock
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:51:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220621155134.1932383-8-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621155134.1932383-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
The matrix_dev->lock mutex is being renamed to matrix_dev->mdevs_lock to
better reflect its purpose, which is to control access to the state of the
mediated devices under the control of the vfio_ap device driver.
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 76 ++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 4 +-
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
index 1ff6e3dbbffe..ed162732b139 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
goto matrix_alloc_err;
}
- mutex_init(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_init(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matrix_dev->mdev_list);
dev_set_name(&matrix_dev->device, "%s", VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 0f3cdd40c23e..f81bf8686464 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -397,10 +397,12 @@ static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
+
if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook) {
VFIO_AP_DBF_WARN("%s: PQAP(AQIC) hook not registered with the vfio_ap driver: apqn=0x%04x\n",
__func__, apqn);
+
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -435,7 +437,7 @@ static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
out_unlock:
memcpy(&vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1], &qstatus, sizeof(qstatus));
vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1] >>= 32;
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -531,9 +533,9 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
vfio_ap_matrix_init(&matrix_dev->info, &matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb);
hash_init(matrix_mdev->qtable.queues);
dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, matrix_mdev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
list_add(&matrix_mdev->node, &matrix_dev->mdev_list);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
ret = vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev(&matrix_mdev->vdev);
if (ret)
@@ -542,9 +544,9 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
return 0;
err_list:
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
list_del(&matrix_mdev->node);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
vfio_uninit_group_dev(&matrix_mdev->vdev);
kfree(matrix_mdev);
err_dec_available:
@@ -607,11 +609,11 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
vfio_unregister_group_dev(&matrix_mdev->vdev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev);
vfio_ap_mdev_unlink_fr_queues(matrix_mdev);
list_del(&matrix_mdev->node);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
vfio_uninit_group_dev(&matrix_mdev->vdev);
kfree(matrix_mdev);
atomic_inc(&matrix_dev->available_instances);
@@ -787,7 +789,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If the KVM guest is running, disallow assignment of adapter */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -819,7 +821,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, matrix_mdev);
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -862,7 +864,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
unsigned long apid;
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If the KVM guest is running, disallow unassignment of adapter */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -887,7 +889,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(unassign_adapter);
@@ -942,7 +944,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long max_apqi = matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If the KVM guest is running, disallow assignment of domain */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -973,7 +975,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
matrix_mdev);
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1016,7 +1018,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
unsigned long apqi;
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If the KVM guest is running, disallow unassignment of domain */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -1042,7 +1044,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(unassign_domain);
@@ -1069,7 +1071,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_control_domain_store(struct device *dev,
unsigned long id;
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If the KVM guest is running, disallow assignment of control domain */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -1095,7 +1097,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_control_domain_store(struct device *dev,
vfio_ap_mdev_filter_cdoms(matrix_mdev);
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(assign_control_domain);
@@ -1123,7 +1125,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_control_domain_store(struct device *dev,
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long max_domid = matrix_mdev->matrix.adm_max;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
/* If a KVM guest is running, disallow unassignment of control domain */
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
@@ -1146,7 +1148,7 @@ static ssize_t unassign_control_domain_store(struct device *dev,
ret = count;
done:
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(unassign_control_domain);
@@ -1162,13 +1164,13 @@ static ssize_t control_domains_show(struct device *dev,
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long max_domid = matrix_mdev->matrix.adm_max;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
for_each_set_bit_inv(id, matrix_mdev->matrix.adm, max_domid + 1) {
n = sprintf(bufpos, "%04lx\n", id);
bufpos += n;
nchars += n;
}
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return nchars;
}
@@ -1191,7 +1193,7 @@ static ssize_t matrix_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
apid1 = find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, napm_bits);
apqi1 = find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, naqm_bits);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
if ((apid1 < napm_bits) && (apqi1 < naqm_bits)) {
for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, napm_bits) {
@@ -1217,7 +1219,7 @@ static ssize_t matrix_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return nchars;
}
@@ -1265,12 +1267,12 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
up_write(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
list_for_each_entry(m, &matrix_dev->mdev_list, node) {
if (m != matrix_mdev && m->kvm == kvm) {
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return -EPERM;
}
}
@@ -1282,7 +1284,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb.adm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
}
return 0;
@@ -1334,7 +1336,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
up_write(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(kvm);
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev);
@@ -1342,7 +1344,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
}
}
@@ -1497,7 +1499,7 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ap_mdev_ioctl(struct vfio_device *vdev,
container_of(vdev, struct ap_matrix_mdev, vdev);
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
switch (cmd) {
case VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO:
ret = vfio_ap_mdev_get_device_info(arg);
@@ -1509,7 +1511,7 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ap_mdev_ioctl(struct vfio_device *vdev,
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
break;
}
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1538,7 +1540,7 @@ static ssize_t status_show(struct device *dev,
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
struct ap_device *apdev = to_ap_dev(dev);
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
q = dev_get_drvdata(&apdev->device);
matrix_mdev = vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue(q);
@@ -1554,7 +1556,7 @@ static ssize_t status_show(struct device *dev,
AP_QUEUE_UNASSIGNED);
}
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return nchars;
}
@@ -1649,7 +1651,7 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
if (!q)
return -ENOMEM;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
q->apqn = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device)->qid;
q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
vfio_ap_queue_link_mdev(q);
@@ -1659,7 +1661,7 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
q->matrix_mdev);
}
dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, q);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -1669,7 +1671,7 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
unsigned long apid;
struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
sysfs_remove_group(&apdev->device.kobj, &vfio_queue_attr_group);
q = dev_get_drvdata(&apdev->device);
@@ -1684,5 +1686,5 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q, 1);
dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
kfree(q);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
index acb3f9d22025..22278d85a801 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
* @available_instances: number of mediated matrix devices that can be created
* @info: the struct containing the output from the PQAP(QCI) instruction
* @mdev_list: the list of mediated matrix devices created
- * @lock: mutex for locking the AP matrix device. This lock will be
+ * @mdevs_lock: mutex for locking the AP matrix device. This lock will be
* taken every time we fiddle with state managed by the vfio_ap
* driver, be it using @mdev_list or writing the state of a
* single ap_matrix_mdev device. It's quite coarse but we don't
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_dev {
atomic_t available_instances;
struct ap_config_info info;
struct list_head mdev_list;
- struct mutex lock;
+ struct mutex mdevs_lock;
struct ap_driver *vfio_ap_drv;
};
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 15:51 [PATCH v20 00/20] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 01/20] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 02/20] s390/vfio-ap: move probe and remove callbacks to vfio_ap_ops.c Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 03/20] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 04/20] s390/vfio-ap: introduce shadow APCB Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 05/20] s390/vfio-ap: refresh guest's APCB by filtering AP resources assigned to mdev Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 06/20] s390/vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP queues to mdev device Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 08/20] s390/vfio-ap: introduce new mutex to control access to the KVM pointer Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 09/20] s390/vfio-ap: use proper locking order when setting/clearing " Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 10/20] s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on assign/unassign Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 20:02 ` Jason J. Herne
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 11/20] s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on queue probe/remove Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 12/20] s390/vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP devices when assigned/unassigned Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 13/20] s390/vfio-ap: hot plug/unplug of AP devices when probed/removed Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 14/20] s390/vfio-ap: reset queues after adapter/domain unassignment Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 15/20] s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 16/20] s390/vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest's matrix Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 17/20] s390/vfio-ap: handle config changed and scan complete notification Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 18/20] s390/vfio-ap: update docs to include dynamic config support Tony Krowiak
2022-07-04 21:20 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 19/20] s390/Docs: new doc describing lock usage by the vfio_ap device driver Tony Krowiak
2022-07-05 4:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-05 7:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-21 15:51 ` [PATCH v20 20/20] MAINTAINERS: pick up all vfio_ap docs for VFIO AP maintainers Tony Krowiak
2022-06-21 19:56 ` Jason J. Herne
2022-06-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v20 00/20] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Christian Borntraeger
2022-06-22 10:42 ` Halil Pasic
2022-06-22 12:40 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220621155134.1932383-8-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox