From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcorr@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
joro@8bytes.org, mizhang@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Subject: [V2 07/11] KVM: selftests: Consolidate boilerplate code in get_ucall()
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:11:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220801201109.825284-8-pgonda@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220801201109.825284-1-pgonda@google.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Consolidate the actual copying of a ucall struct from guest=>host into
the common get_ucall(). Return a host virtual address instead of a guest
virtual address even though the addr_gva2hva() part could be moved to
get_ucall() too. Conceptually, get_ucall() is invoked from the host and
should return a host virtual address (and returning NULL for "nothing to
see here" is far superior to returning 0).
Use pointer shenanigans instead of an unnecessary bounce buffer when the
caller of get_ucall() provides a valid pointer.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h | 8 ++------
.../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 13 +++----------
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c | 19 +++----------------
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c | 16 +++-------------
.../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c | 16 +++-------------
6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
index 5a85f5318bbe..c1bc8e33ef3f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ struct ucall {
void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *arg);
void ucall_arch_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm);
void ucall_arch_do_ucall(vm_vaddr_t uc);
-uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc);
+uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...);
+uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc);
static inline void ucall_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *arg)
{
@@ -41,11 +42,6 @@ static inline void ucall_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm)
ucall_arch_uninit(vm);
}
-static inline uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
-{
- return ucall_arch_get_ucall(vcpu, uc);
-}
-
#define GUEST_SYNC_ARGS(stage, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) \
ucall(UCALL_SYNC, 6, "hello", stage, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)
#define GUEST_SYNC(stage) ucall(UCALL_SYNC, 2, "hello", stage)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
index 1c81a6a5c1f2..d2f099caa9ab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
@@ -78,24 +78,17 @@ void ucall_arch_do_ucall(vm_vaddr_t uc)
uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
{
struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
- struct ucall ucall = {};
-
- if (uc)
- memset(uc, 0, sizeof(*uc));
if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO &&
run->mmio.phys_addr == (uint64_t)ucall_exit_mmio_addr) {
- vm_vaddr_t gva;
+ uint64_t ucall_addr;
TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write && run->mmio.len == 8,
"Unexpected ucall exit mmio address access");
memcpy(&gva, run->mmio.data, sizeof(gva));
- memcpy(&ucall, addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, gva), sizeof(ucall));
- vcpu_run_complete_io(vcpu);
- if (uc)
- memcpy(uc, &ucall, sizeof(ucall));
+ return ucall_addr;
}
- return ucall.cmd;
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
index b1598f418c1f..3f000d0b705f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
@@ -51,27 +51,15 @@ void ucall_arch_do_ucall(vm_vaddr_t uc)
uc, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
}
-uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
+uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
- struct ucall ucall = {};
-
- if (uc)
- memset(uc, 0, sizeof(*uc));
if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_RISCV_SBI &&
run->riscv_sbi.extension_id == KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_EXT) {
switch (run->riscv_sbi.function_id) {
case KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UCALL:
- memcpy(&ucall,
- addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, run->riscv_sbi.args[0]),
- sizeof(ucall));
-
- vcpu_run_complete_io(vcpu);
- if (uc)
- memcpy(uc, &ucall, sizeof(ucall));
-
- break;
+ return vcpu->vm, run->riscv_sbi.args[0];
case KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UNEXP:
vcpu_dump(stderr, vcpu, 2);
TEST_ASSERT(0, "Unexpected trap taken by guest");
@@ -80,6 +68,5 @@ uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
break;
}
}
-
- return ucall.cmd;
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
index 114cb4af295f..f7a5a7eb4aa8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
@@ -20,13 +20,9 @@ void ucall_arch_do_ucall(vm_vaddr_t uc)
asm volatile ("diag 0,%0,0x501" : : "a"(uc) : "memory");
}
-uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
+uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
- struct ucall ucall = {};
-
- if (uc)
- memset(uc, 0, sizeof(*uc));
if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC &&
run->s390_sieic.icptcode == 4 &&
@@ -34,13 +30,7 @@ uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
(run->s390_sieic.ipb >> 16) == 0x501) {
int reg = run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0xf;
- memcpy(&ucall, addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, run->s.regs.gprs[reg]),
- sizeof(ucall));
-
- vcpu_run_complete_io(vcpu);
- if (uc)
- memcpy(uc, &ucall, sizeof(ucall));
+ return run->s.regs.gprs[reg];
}
-
- return ucall.cmd;
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
index 749ffdf23855..a060252bab40 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
@@ -18,3 +18,22 @@ void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...)
ucall_arch_do_ucall((vm_vaddr_t)&uc);
}
+
+uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
+{
+ struct ucall ucall;
+ void *addr;
+
+ if (!uc)
+ uc = &ucall;
+
+ addr = addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, ucall_arch_get_ucall(vcpu));
+ if (addr) {
+ memcpy(uc, addr, sizeof(*uc));
+ vcpu_run_complete_io(vcpu);
+ } else {
+ memset(uc, 0, sizeof(*uc));
+ }
+
+ return uc->cmd;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
index 9f532dba1003..24746120a593 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
@@ -22,25 +22,15 @@ void ucall_arch_do_ucall(vm_vaddr_t uc)
: : [port] "d" (UCALL_PIO_PORT), "D" (uc) : "rax", "memory");
}
-uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
+uint64_t ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
- struct ucall ucall = {};
-
- if (uc)
- memset(uc, 0, sizeof(*uc));
if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO && run->io.port == UCALL_PIO_PORT) {
struct kvm_regs regs;
vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
- memcpy(&ucall, addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, (vm_vaddr_t)regs.rdi),
- sizeof(ucall));
-
- vcpu_run_complete_io(vcpu);
- if (uc)
- memcpy(uc, &ucall, sizeof(ucall));
+ return regs.rdi;
}
-
- return ucall.cmd;
+ return 0;
}
--
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-01 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-01 20:10 [V2 00/11] KVM: selftests: Add simple SEV test Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:10 ` [V2 01/11] KVM: selftests: move vm_phy_pages_alloc() earlier in file Peter Gonda
2022-08-02 9:59 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 02/11] KVM: selftests: sparsebit: add const where appropriate Peter Gonda
2022-08-02 10:00 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 03/11] KVM: selftests: add hooks for managing encrypted guest memory Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 04/11] KVM: selftests: handle encryption bits in page tables Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 05/11] KVM: selftests: add support for encrypted vm_vaddr_* allocations Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 06/11] KVM: selftests: Consolidate common code for popuplating Peter Gonda
2022-08-02 10:09 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-02 14:45 ` Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` Peter Gonda [this message]
2022-08-02 8:37 ` [V2 07/11] KVM: selftests: Consolidate boilerplate code in get_ucall() Andrew Jones
2022-08-02 9:54 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-02 14:46 ` Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 08/11] tools: Add atomic_test_and_set_bit() Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 09/11] KVM: selftests: Make ucall work with encrypted guests Peter Gonda
2022-08-02 9:49 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-02 13:51 ` Peter Gonda
2022-08-02 14:26 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-02 14:36 ` Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 10/11] KVM: selftests: add library for creating/interacting with SEV guests Peter Gonda
2022-08-01 20:11 ` [V2 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add simple sev vm testing Peter Gonda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220801201109.825284-8-pgonda@google.com \
--to=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox