From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: smp: use an array for sigp calls
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220810074616.1223561-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810074616.1223561-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Tests for the SIGP calls are quite similar, so we have a lot of code
duplication right now. Since upcoming changes will add more cases,
refactor the code to iterate over an array, similarily as we already do
for test_invalid().
The receiving CPU is disabled for IO interrupts. This makes sure the
conditional emergency signal is accepted and doesn't hurt the other
orders.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 34ae91c3fe12..5a269087581f 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -43,6 +43,20 @@ static const struct sigp_invalid_cases cases_valid_cpu_addr[] = {
static uint32_t cpu1_prefix;
+struct sigp_call_cases {
+ char name[20];
+ int call;
+ uint16_t ext_int_expected_type;
+ unsigned int cr0_bit;
+ bool supports_pv;
+};
+static const struct sigp_call_cases cases_sigp_call[] = {
+ { "emcall", SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0x1201, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, true },
+ { "cond emcall", SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0x1201, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, false },
+ { "ecall", SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0x1202, CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL, true },
+};
+static const struct sigp_call_cases *current_sigp_call_case;
+
static void test_invalid(void)
{
const struct sigp_invalid_cases *c;
@@ -289,97 +303,57 @@ static void test_set_prefix(void)
}
-static void ecall(void)
+static void call_received(void)
{
expect_ext_int();
- ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL);
- psw_mask_set_bits(PSW_MASK_EXT);
- set_flag(1);
- while (lowcore.ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
- report_pass("received");
- set_flag(1);
-}
+ ctl_set_bit(0, current_sigp_call_case->cr0_bit);
+ /* make sure conditional emergency is accepted by disabling IO interrupts */
+ psw_mask_clear_and_set_bits(PSW_MASK_IO, PSW_MASK_EXT);
-static void test_ecall(void)
-{
- struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
- psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
+ /* Indicate that we're ready to receive the call */
+ set_flag(1);
- report_prefix_push("ecall");
- set_flag(0);
+ while (lowcore.ext_int_code != current_sigp_call_case->ext_int_expected_type)
+ mb();
+ report_pass("received");
- smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
- wait_for_flag();
- set_flag(0);
- smp_sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
- wait_for_flag();
- smp_cpu_stop(1);
- report_prefix_pop();
-}
+ ctl_clear_bit(0, current_sigp_call_case->cr0_bit);
-static void emcall(void)
-{
- expect_ext_int();
- ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL);
- psw_mask_set_bits(PSW_MASK_EXT);
- set_flag(1);
- while (lowcore.ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
- report_pass("received");
+ /* Indicate that we're done */
set_flag(1);
}
-static void test_emcall(void)
+static void test_calls(void)
{
+ int i;
struct psw psw;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
- psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
- report_prefix_push("emcall");
- set_flag(0);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases_sigp_call); i++) {
+ current_sigp_call_case = &cases_sigp_call[i];
- smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
- wait_for_flag();
- set_flag(0);
- smp_sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
- wait_for_flag();
- smp_cpu_stop(1);
+ report_prefix_push(current_sigp_call_case->name);
+ if (!current_sigp_call_case->supports_pv && uv_os_is_guest()) {
+ report_skip("Not supported under PV");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ continue;
+ }
- report_prefix_pop();
-}
+ set_flag(0);
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)call_received;
+ smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
-static void test_cond_emcall(void)
-{
- uint32_t status = 0;
- struct psw psw;
- int cc;
- psw.mask = extract_psw_mask() & ~PSW_MASK_IO;
- psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
+ /* Wait until the receiver has finished setup */
+ wait_for_flag();
+ set_flag(0);
- report_prefix_push("conditional emergency call");
+ smp_sigp(1, current_sigp_call_case->call, 0, NULL);
- if (uv_os_is_guest()) {
- report_skip("unsupported under PV");
- goto out;
+ /* Wait until the receiver has handled the call */
+ wait_for_flag();
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+ report_prefix_pop();
}
-
- report_prefix_push("success");
- set_flag(0);
-
- smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
- wait_for_flag();
- set_flag(0);
- cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, &status);
- report(!cc, "CC = 0");
-
- wait_for_flag();
- smp_cpu_stop(1);
-
- report_prefix_pop();
-
-out:
- report_prefix_pop();
-
}
static void test_sense_running(void)
@@ -499,9 +473,7 @@ int main(void)
test_stop_store_status();
test_store_status();
test_set_prefix();
- test_ecall();
- test_emcall();
- test_cond_emcall();
+ test_calls();
test_sense_running();
test_reset();
test_reset_initial();
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 7:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/3] s390x: add tests for SIGP call orders in enabled wait Nico Boehr
2022-08-10 7:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/3] s390x: smp: move sigp calls with invalid cpu address to array Nico Boehr
2022-08-16 12:12 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-10 7:46 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-08-16 15:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: smp: use an array for sigp calls Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-10 7:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/3] s390x: smp: add tests for calls in wait state Nico Boehr
2022-08-16 15:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-17 7:34 ` Janosch Frank
2022-08-17 14:50 ` Nico Boehr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220810074616.1223561-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox