public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: smp: use an array for sigp calls
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:46:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220810074616.1223561-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810074616.1223561-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>

Tests for the SIGP calls are quite similar, so we have a lot of code
duplication right now. Since upcoming changes will add more cases,
refactor the code to iterate over an array, similarily as we already do
for test_invalid().

The receiving CPU is disabled for IO interrupts. This makes sure the
conditional emergency signal is accepted and doesn't hurt the other
orders.

Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 s390x/smp.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 34ae91c3fe12..5a269087581f 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -43,6 +43,20 @@ static const struct sigp_invalid_cases cases_valid_cpu_addr[] = {
 
 static uint32_t cpu1_prefix;
 
+struct sigp_call_cases {
+	char name[20];
+	int call;
+	uint16_t ext_int_expected_type;
+	unsigned int cr0_bit;
+	bool supports_pv;
+};
+static const struct sigp_call_cases cases_sigp_call[] = {
+	{ "emcall",      SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL,      0x1201, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, true },
+	{ "cond emcall", SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0x1201, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, false },
+	{ "ecall",       SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL,         0x1202, CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL,    true },
+};
+static const struct sigp_call_cases *current_sigp_call_case;
+
 static void test_invalid(void)
 {
 	const struct sigp_invalid_cases *c;
@@ -289,97 +303,57 @@ static void test_set_prefix(void)
 
 }
 
-static void ecall(void)
+static void call_received(void)
 {
 	expect_ext_int();
-	ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL);
-	psw_mask_set_bits(PSW_MASK_EXT);
-	set_flag(1);
-	while (lowcore.ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
-	report_pass("received");
-	set_flag(1);
-}
+	ctl_set_bit(0, current_sigp_call_case->cr0_bit);
+	/* make sure conditional emergency is accepted by disabling IO interrupts */
+	psw_mask_clear_and_set_bits(PSW_MASK_IO, PSW_MASK_EXT);
 
-static void test_ecall(void)
-{
-	struct psw psw;
-	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
-	psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
+	/* Indicate that we're ready to receive the call */
+	set_flag(1);
 
-	report_prefix_push("ecall");
-	set_flag(0);
+	while (lowcore.ext_int_code != current_sigp_call_case->ext_int_expected_type)
+		mb();
+	report_pass("received");
 
-	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
-	wait_for_flag();
-	set_flag(0);
-	smp_sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
-	wait_for_flag();
-	smp_cpu_stop(1);
-	report_prefix_pop();
-}
+	ctl_clear_bit(0, current_sigp_call_case->cr0_bit);
 
-static void emcall(void)
-{
-	expect_ext_int();
-	ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL);
-	psw_mask_set_bits(PSW_MASK_EXT);
-	set_flag(1);
-	while (lowcore.ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
-	report_pass("received");
+	/* Indicate that we're done */
 	set_flag(1);
 }
 
-static void test_emcall(void)
+static void test_calls(void)
 {
+	int i;
 	struct psw psw;
-	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
-	psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
 
-	report_prefix_push("emcall");
-	set_flag(0);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases_sigp_call); i++) {
+		current_sigp_call_case = &cases_sigp_call[i];
 
-	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
-	wait_for_flag();
-	set_flag(0);
-	smp_sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
-	wait_for_flag();
-	smp_cpu_stop(1);
+		report_prefix_push(current_sigp_call_case->name);
+		if (!current_sigp_call_case->supports_pv && uv_os_is_guest()) {
+			report_skip("Not supported under PV");
+			report_prefix_pop();
+			continue;
+		}
 
-	report_prefix_pop();
-}
+		set_flag(0);
+		psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+		psw.addr = (unsigned long)call_received;
+		smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
 
-static void test_cond_emcall(void)
-{
-	uint32_t status = 0;
-	struct psw psw;
-	int cc;
-	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask() & ~PSW_MASK_IO;
-	psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
+		/* Wait until the receiver has finished setup */
+		wait_for_flag();
+		set_flag(0);
 
-	report_prefix_push("conditional emergency call");
+		smp_sigp(1, current_sigp_call_case->call, 0, NULL);
 
-	if (uv_os_is_guest()) {
-		report_skip("unsupported under PV");
-		goto out;
+		/* Wait until the receiver has handled the call */
+		wait_for_flag();
+		smp_cpu_stop(1);
+		report_prefix_pop();
 	}
-
-	report_prefix_push("success");
-	set_flag(0);
-
-	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
-	wait_for_flag();
-	set_flag(0);
-	cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, &status);
-	report(!cc, "CC = 0");
-
-	wait_for_flag();
-	smp_cpu_stop(1);
-
-	report_prefix_pop();
-
-out:
-	report_prefix_pop();
-
 }
 
 static void test_sense_running(void)
@@ -499,9 +473,7 @@ int main(void)
 	test_stop_store_status();
 	test_store_status();
 	test_set_prefix();
-	test_ecall();
-	test_emcall();
-	test_cond_emcall();
+	test_calls();
 	test_sense_running();
 	test_reset();
 	test_reset_initial();
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10  7:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/3] s390x: add tests for SIGP call orders in enabled wait Nico Boehr
2022-08-10  7:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/3] s390x: smp: move sigp calls with invalid cpu address to array Nico Boehr
2022-08-16 12:12   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-10  7:46 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-08-16 15:09   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: smp: use an array for sigp calls Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-10  7:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/3] s390x: smp: add tests for calls in wait state Nico Boehr
2022-08-16 15:37   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-08-17  7:34   ` Janosch Frank
2022-08-17 14:50     ` Nico Boehr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220810074616.1223561-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox