public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: selftests: Add ucall pool based implementation
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 03:21:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824032115.3563686-7-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824032115.3563686-1-seanjc@google.com>

From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>

To play nice with guests whose stack memory is encrypted, e.g. AMD SEV,
introduce a new "ucall pool" implementation that passes the ucall struct
via dedicated memory (which can be mapped shared, a.k.a. as plain text).

Because not all architectures have access to the vCPU index in the guest,
use a bitmap with atomic accesses to track which entries in the pool are
free/used.  A list+lock could also work in theory, but synchronizing the
individual pointers to the guest would be a mess.

Note, there's no need to rewalk the bitmap to ensure success.  If all
vCPUs are simply allocating, success is guaranteed because there are
enough entries for all vCPUs.  If one or more vCPUs are freeing and then
reallocating, success is guaranteed because vCPUs _always_ walk the
bitmap from 0=>N; if vCPU frees an entry and then wins a race to
re-allocate, then either it will consume the entry it just freed (bit is
the first free bit), or the losing vCPU is guaranteed to see the freed
bit (winner consumes an earlier bit, which the loser hasn't yet visited).

Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h      | 14 ++--
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c |  7 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c |  2 +-
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c  | 83 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c  |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
index 8077a6d8b1ba..360397e3cbf5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ enum {
 struct ucall {
 	uint64_t cmd;
 	uint64_t args[UCALL_MAX_ARGS];
+
+	/* Host virtual address of this struct. */
+	struct ucall *hva;
 };
 
 void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t mmio_gpa);
@@ -32,15 +35,8 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...);
 uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc);
 
-static inline void ucall_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t mmio_gpa)
-{
-	ucall_arch_init(vm, mmio_gpa);
-}
-
-static inline void ucall_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm)
-{
-	ucall_arch_uninit(vm);
-}
+void ucall_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t mmio_gpa);
+void ucall_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm);
 
 #define GUEST_SYNC_ARGS(stage, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)	\
 				ucall(UCALL_SYNC, 6, "hello", stage, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
index acb47c813477..5f79c9fc72d7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
@@ -43,12 +43,9 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO &&
 	    run->mmio.phys_addr == vcpu->vm->ucall_mmio_addr) {
-		vm_vaddr_t gva;
-
-		TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write && run->mmio.len == 8,
+		TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write && run->mmio.len == sizeof(uint64_t),
 			    "Unexpected ucall exit mmio address access");
-		memcpy(&gva, run->mmio.data, sizeof(gva));
-		return addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, gva);
+		return (void *)(*((uint64_t *)run->mmio.data));
 	}
 
 	return NULL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
index c58ecb8a0981..9526a200d038 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	    run->riscv_sbi.extension_id == KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_EXT) {
 		switch (run->riscv_sbi.function_id) {
 		case KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UCALL:
-			return addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, run->riscv_sbi.args[0]);
+			return (void *)run->riscv_sbi.args[0];
 		case KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UNEXP:
 			vcpu_dump(stderr, vcpu, 2);
 			TEST_ASSERT(0, "Unexpected trap taken by guest");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
index 208f0f04299b..1efdeac60b4e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	    (run->s390_sieic.ipb >> 16) == 0x501) {
 		int reg = run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0xf;
 
-		return addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, run->s.regs.gprs[reg]);
+		return (void *)run->s.regs.gprs[reg];
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
index ced480860746..29f8cb614382 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c
@@ -1,22 +1,97 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 #include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "linux/types.h"
+#include "linux/bitmap.h"
+#include "linux/atomic.h"
+
+struct ucall_header {
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(in_use, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
+	struct ucall ucalls[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
+};
+
+/*
+ * This "global" holds different per-VM values, it must not be accessed from
+ * host code except to sync the guest value, and that must be done atomically.
+ */
+static struct ucall_header *ucall_pool;
+
+static void ucall_set_pool(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct ucall_header *val)
+{
+	atomic_sync_global_pointer_to_guest(vm, ucall_pool, val);
+}
+
+void ucall_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t mmio_gpa)
+{
+	struct ucall_header *hdr;
+	struct ucall *uc;
+	vm_vaddr_t vaddr;
+	int i;
+
+	vaddr = vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, sizeof(*hdr), KVM_UTIL_MIN_VADDR);
+	hdr = (struct ucall_header *)addr_gva2hva(vm, vaddr);
+	memset(hdr, 0, sizeof(*hdr));
+
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
+		uc = &hdr->ucalls[i];
+		uc->hva = uc;
+	}
+
+	ucall_set_pool(vm, (void *)vaddr);
+
+	ucall_arch_init(vm, mmio_gpa);
+}
+
+void ucall_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	ucall_set_pool(vm, NULL);
+
+	ucall_arch_uninit(vm);
+}
+
+static struct ucall *ucall_alloc(void)
+{
+	struct ucall *uc;
+	int i;
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(ucall_pool && ucall_pool->in_use);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
+		if (!atomic_test_and_set_bit(i, ucall_pool->in_use)) {
+			uc = &ucall_pool->ucalls[i];
+			memset(uc->args, 0, sizeof(uc->args));
+			return uc;
+		}
+	}
+	GUEST_ASSERT(0);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static noinline void ucall_free(struct ucall *uc)
+{
+	/* Beware, here be pointer arithmetic.  */
+	clear_bit(uc - ucall_pool->ucalls, ucall_pool->in_use);
+}
 
 void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...)
 {
-	struct ucall uc = {};
+	struct ucall *uc;
 	va_list va;
 	int i;
 
-	WRITE_ONCE(uc.cmd, cmd);
+	uc = ucall_alloc();
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(uc->cmd, cmd);
 
 	nargs = min(nargs, UCALL_MAX_ARGS);
 
 	va_start(va, nargs);
 	for (i = 0; i < nargs; ++i)
-		WRITE_ONCE(uc.args[i], va_arg(va, uint64_t));
+		WRITE_ONCE(uc->args[i], va_arg(va, uint64_t));
 	va_end(va);
 
-	ucall_arch_do_ucall((vm_vaddr_t)&uc);
+	ucall_arch_do_ucall((vm_vaddr_t)uc->hva);
+
+	ucall_free(uc);
 }
 
 uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
index 016a0487cf72..82e7f6ae7811 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		struct kvm_regs regs;
 
 		vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, &regs);
-		return addr_gva2hva(vcpu->vm, regs.rdi);
+		return (void *)regs.rdi;
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-24  3:21 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: selftests: Implement ucall "pool" (for SEV) Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: selftests: Consolidate common code for populating ucall struct Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: selftests: Consolidate boilerplate code in get_ucall() Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: selftests: Automatically do init_ucall() for non-barebones VMs Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] tools: Add atomic_test_and_set_bit() Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: selftests: Make arm64's MMIO ucall multi-VM friendly Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24 15:00   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-24 15:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  3:21 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220824032115.3563686-7-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox