From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: selftests: Compare insn opcodes directly in fix_hypercall_test
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:36:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220928233652.783504-3-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928233652.783504-1-seanjc@google.com>
Directly compare the expected versus observed hypercall instructions when
verifying that KVM patched in the native hypercall (FIX_HYPERCALL_INSN
quirk enabled). gcc rightly complains that doing a 4-byte memcpy() with
an "unsigned char" as the source generates an out-of-bounds accesses.
Alternatively, "exp" and "obs" could be declared as 3-byte arrays, but
there's no known reason to copy locally instead of comparing directly.
In function ‘assert_hypercall_insn’,
inlined from ‘guest_main’ at x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:91:2:
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:63:9: error: array subscript ‘unsigned int[0]’
is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned char[1]’ [-Werror=array-bounds]
63 | memcpy(&exp, exp_insn, sizeof(exp));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c: In function ‘guest_main’:
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:42:22: note: object ‘vmx_hypercall_insn’ of size 1
42 | extern unsigned char vmx_hypercall_insn;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:25:22: note: object ‘svm_hypercall_insn’ of size 1
25 | extern unsigned char svm_hypercall_insn;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In function ‘assert_hypercall_insn’,
inlined from ‘guest_main’ at x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:91:2:
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:64:9: error: array subscript ‘unsigned int[0]’
is partly outside array bounds of ‘unsigned char[1]’ [-Werror=array-bounds]
64 | memcpy(&obs, obs_insn, sizeof(obs));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c: In function ‘guest_main’:
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:25:22: note: object ‘svm_hypercall_insn’ of size 1
25 | extern unsigned char svm_hypercall_insn;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:42:22: note: object ‘vmx_hypercall_insn’ of size 1
42 | extern unsigned char vmx_hypercall_insn;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [../lib.mk:135: tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test] Error 1
Fixes: 6c2fa8b20d0c ("selftests: KVM: Test KVM_X86_QUIRK_FIX_HYPERCALL_INSN")
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c | 34 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c
index b1905d280ef5..e0004bd26536 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "processor.h"
+/* VMCALL and VMMCALL are both 3-byte opcodes. */
+#define HYPERCALL_INSN_SIZE 3
+
static bool ud_expected;
static void guest_ud_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
@@ -22,7 +25,7 @@ static void guest_ud_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
GUEST_DONE();
}
-extern unsigned char svm_hypercall_insn;
+extern uint8_t svm_hypercall_insn[HYPERCALL_INSN_SIZE];
static uint64_t svm_do_sched_yield(uint8_t apic_id)
{
uint64_t ret;
@@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ static uint64_t svm_do_sched_yield(uint8_t apic_id)
return ret;
}
-extern unsigned char vmx_hypercall_insn;
+extern uint8_t vmx_hypercall_insn[HYPERCALL_INSN_SIZE];
static uint64_t vmx_do_sched_yield(uint8_t apic_id)
{
uint64_t ret;
@@ -56,30 +59,20 @@ static uint64_t vmx_do_sched_yield(uint8_t apic_id)
return ret;
}
-static void assert_hypercall_insn(unsigned char *exp_insn, unsigned char *obs_insn)
-{
- uint32_t exp = 0, obs = 0;
-
- memcpy(&exp, exp_insn, sizeof(exp));
- memcpy(&obs, obs_insn, sizeof(obs));
-
- GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(exp, obs);
-}
-
static void guest_main(void)
{
- unsigned char *native_hypercall_insn, *hypercall_insn;
+ uint8_t *native_hypercall_insn, *hypercall_insn;
uint8_t apic_id;
apic_id = GET_APIC_ID_FIELD(xapic_read_reg(APIC_ID));
if (is_intel_cpu()) {
- native_hypercall_insn = &vmx_hypercall_insn;
- hypercall_insn = &svm_hypercall_insn;
+ native_hypercall_insn = vmx_hypercall_insn;
+ hypercall_insn = svm_hypercall_insn;
svm_do_sched_yield(apic_id);
} else if (is_amd_cpu()) {
- native_hypercall_insn = &svm_hypercall_insn;
- hypercall_insn = &vmx_hypercall_insn;
+ native_hypercall_insn = svm_hypercall_insn;
+ hypercall_insn = vmx_hypercall_insn;
vmx_do_sched_yield(apic_id);
} else {
GUEST_ASSERT(0);
@@ -87,8 +80,13 @@ static void guest_main(void)
return;
}
+ /*
+ * The hypercall didn't #UD (guest_ud_handler() signals "done" if a #UD
+ * occurs). Verify that a #UD is NOT expected and that KVM patched in
+ * the native hypercall.
+ */
GUEST_ASSERT(!ud_expected);
- assert_hypercall_insn(native_hypercall_insn, hypercall_insn);
+ GUEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(native_hypercall_insn, hypercall_insn, HYPERCALL_INSN_SIZE));
GUEST_DONE();
}
--
2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 23:36 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: selftests: Fix "fix hypercall test" build errors Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: selftests: Implement memcmp(), memcpy(), and memset() for guest use Sean Christopherson
2022-09-29 8:48 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-29 15:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: selftests: Remove unnecessary register shuffling in fix_hypercall_test Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: selftests: Hardcode VMCALL/VMMCALL opcodes in "fix hypercall" test Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: selftests: Explicitly verify KVM doesn't patch hypercall if quirk==off Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: selftests: Dedup subtests of fix_hypercall_test Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Revert "KVM: selftests: Fix nested SVM tests when built with clang" Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 23:44 ` Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220928233652.783504-3-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox