public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 0/1] s390x: Add exit time test
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:23:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221014072312.198606-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

v5->v6:
---
* multiply first, then divide when normalizing (thanks Claudio)
* print fractions of us (thanks Claudio)
* remove non-normalized output (thanks Claudio)
* fence dag9c since not supported under TCG

v4->v5:
---
* print normalized runtime to be able to compare runtime of
  instructions in a single run (thanks Claudio)

v3->v4:
---
* remove merge conflict markers (thanks Christian)

v2->v3:
---
* print average (thanks Claudio)
* have asm constraints look the same everywhere (thanks Claudio)
* rebase patchset on top of my migration sck patches[1] to make use of the
  time.h improvements

v1->v2:
---
* add missing cc clobber, fix constraints for get_clock_us() (thanks
  Thomas)
* avoid array and use pointer to const char* (thanks Thomas)
* add comment why testing nop makes sense (thanks Thomas)
* rework constraints and clobbers (thanks Thomas)

Sometimes, it is useful to measure the exit time of certain instructions
to e.g. identify performance regressions in instructions emulated by the
hypervisor.

This series adds a test which executes some instructions and measures
their execution time. Since their execution time depends a lot on the
environment at hand, all tests are reported as PASS currently.

The point of this series is not so much the instructions which have been
chosen here (but your ideas are welcome), but rather the general
question whether it makes sense to have a test like this in
kvm-unit-tests.

This series is based on my migration sck patches[1] to make use of the
time.h improvements there.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221011170024.972135-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com/

Nico Boehr (1):
  s390x: add exittime tests

 s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
 s390x/exittime.c    | 296 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 s390x/unittests.cfg |   4 +
 3 files changed, 301 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 s390x/exittime.c

-- 
2.36.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-14  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14  7:23 Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-10-14  7:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/1] s390x: add exittime tests Nico Boehr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221014072312.198606-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox