From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/7] vfio-ccw parent rework
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:21:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019162135.798901-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi all,
There have been discussions and attempts [1][2] to rework the vfio-ccw device
lifecycle to better align with the needs/expectations of vfio and mdev.
While those languished, commit cb9ff3f3b84c ("vfio: Add helpers for unifying
vfio_device life cycle") implemented a couple of tricks that help vfio and the
drivers that interact with it, while keeping vfio-ccw as-is. A handful of
commits titled "vfio/xxx: Use the new device life cycle helpers" implemented
those tricks for each of the drivers.
This series attempts to address the oddities/shortcomings of vfio-ccw, such
that vfio-ccw can use the same helpers as everyone else, and the tricks that
were implemented by the other drivers can be removed. It is built on 6.1-rc1,
and thus includes the various changes [3][4] that have occurred in and around
these parts.
Patches 1-5 rework the behavior of the vfio-ccw driver's private struct.
In summary, the mdev pieces are split out of vfio_ccw_private and into a
new vfio_ccw_parent struct that will continue to follow today's lifecycle.
The remainder (bulk) of the private struct moves to follow the mdev
probe/remove pair. There's opportunity for further separation of the
things in the private struct, which would simplify some of the vfio-ccw
code, but it got too hairy as I started that. Once vfio-ccw is no longer
considered unique, those cleanups can happen at our leisure.
Patch 6 removes the trickery where vfio-ccw uses vfio_init_device instead of
vfio_alloc_device, and thus removes vfio_init_device from the outside world.
Patch 7 removes vfio_free_device from vfio-ccw and the other drivers (hello,
CC list!), letting it be handled by vfio_device_release directly.
Looking forward to the feedback.
Thanks,
Eric
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v3-57c1502c62fd+2190-ccw_mdev_jgg@nvidia.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220602171948.2790690-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220923092652.100656-1-hch@lst.de/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220921104401.38898-1-kevin.tian@intel.com/
Eric Farman (7):
vfio/ccw: create a parent struct
vfio/ccw: remove private->sch
vfio/ccw: move private initialization to callback
vfio/ccw: move private to mdev lifecycle
vfio/ccw: remove release completion
vfio/ccw: replace vfio_init_device with _alloc_
vfio: Remove vfio_free_device
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c | 5 +-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 182 ++++++++++----------------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 27 ++--
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 108 ++++++++++-----
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_parent.h | 28 ++++
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 22 ++--
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 6 -
drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c | 1 -
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 1 -
drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c | 1 -
drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c | 1 -
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 +---
include/linux/vfio.h | 1 -
samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c | 1 -
samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c | 1 -
samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c | 1 -
17 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 208 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_parent.h
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 16:21 Eric Farman [this message]
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] vfio/ccw: create a parent struct Eric Farman
2022-10-27 20:32 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-28 16:51 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-28 17:21 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] vfio/ccw: remove private->sch Eric Farman
2022-10-28 18:43 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] vfio/ccw: move private initialization to callback Eric Farman
2022-10-28 18:52 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-28 19:18 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] vfio/ccw: move private to mdev lifecycle Eric Farman
2022-11-01 9:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 14:05 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] vfio/ccw: remove release completion Eric Farman
2022-11-01 9:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] vfio/ccw: replace vfio_init_device with _alloc_ Eric Farman
2022-10-19 17:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-19 17:57 ` Eric Farman
2022-10-20 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 9:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] vfio: Remove vfio_free_device Eric Farman
2022-10-19 17:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 9:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] vfio-ccw parent rework Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221019162135.798901-1-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=abhsahu@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox