public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	scgl@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] lib: s390x: sie: Improve validity handling and make it vm specific
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:00:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221020090009.2189-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020090009.2189-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

The current library doesn't support running multiple vms at once as it
stores the validity once and not per vm. Let's move the validity
handling into the vm and introduce a new function to retrieve the vir.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
 lib/s390x/sie.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 lib/s390x/sie.h |  6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.c b/lib/s390x/sie.c
index 00aff713..3fee3def 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sie.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sie.c
@@ -15,19 +15,22 @@
 #include <libcflat.h>
 #include <alloc_page.h>
 
-static bool validity_expected;
-static uint16_t vir;		/* Validity interception reason */
-
-void sie_expect_validity(void)
+void sie_expect_validity(struct vm *vm)
 {
-	validity_expected = true;
-	vir = 0;
+	vm->validity_expected = true;
 }
 
-void sie_check_validity(uint16_t vir_exp)
+uint16_t sie_get_validity(struct vm *vm)
 {
+	assert(vm->sblk->icptcode == ICPT_VALIDITY);
+	return vm->sblk->ipb >> 16;
+}
+
+void sie_check_validity(struct vm *vm, uint16_t vir_exp)
+{
+	uint16_t vir = sie_get_validity(vm);
+
 	report(vir_exp == vir, "VALIDITY: %x", vir);
-	vir = 0;
 }
 
 void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
@@ -35,11 +38,9 @@ void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
 	if (vm->sblk->icptcode != ICPT_VALIDITY)
 		return;
 
-	vir = vm->sblk->ipb >> 16;
-
-	if (!validity_expected)
-		report_abort("VALIDITY: %x", vir);
-	validity_expected = false;
+	if (!vm->validity_expected)
+		report_abort("VALIDITY: %x", sie_get_validity(vm));
+	vm->validity_expected = false;
 }
 
 void sie(struct vm *vm)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.h b/lib/s390x/sie.h
index de91ea5a..320c4218 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sie.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sie.h
@@ -233,14 +233,16 @@ struct vm {
 	struct vm_uv uv;			/* PV UV information */
 	/* Ptr to first guest page */
 	uint8_t *guest_mem;
+	bool validity_expected;
 };
 
 extern void sie_entry(void);
 extern void sie_exit(void);
 extern void sie64a(struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sblk, struct vm_save_area *save_area);
 void sie(struct vm *vm);
-void sie_expect_validity(void);
-void sie_check_validity(uint16_t vir_exp);
+void sie_expect_validity(struct vm *vm);
+uint16_t sie_get_validity(struct vm *vm);
+void sie_check_validity(struct vm *vm, uint16_t vir_exp);
 void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm);
 void sie_guest_sca_create(struct vm *vm);
 void sie_guest_create(struct vm *vm, uint64_t guest_mem, uint64_t guest_mem_len);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20  9:00 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: PV fixups Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: snippets: asm: Add a macro to write an exception PSW Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:14   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: MAKEFILE: Use $< instead of pathsubst Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:14   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add a linker script to assembly snippets Janosch Frank
2022-10-20 10:02   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-10-20  9:18   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] lib: s390x: sie: Improve validity handling and make it vm specific Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] lib: s390x: Use a new asce for each PV guest Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:25   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
2022-10-20 11:46       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] lib: s390x: Enable reusability of VMs that were in PV mode Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:26   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-10-20  9:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] lib: s390x: sie: Properly populate SCA Janosch Frank
2022-10-20  9:50   ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221020090009.2189-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox