kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	paul@xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: MMU: Introduce 'INVALID_GFN' and use it for GFN values
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:16:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221220081642.2bgq7xoeswtkeuym@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5yeKucYYfYOMXqp@google.com>

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 04:34:50PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, Yu Zhang wrote:
> > Currently, KVM xen and its shared info selftest code uses
> > 'GPA_INVALID' for GFN values, but actually it is more accurate
> > to use the name 'INVALID_GFN'. So just add a new definition
> > and use it.
> > 
> > No functional changes intended.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/xen.c                                   | 4 ++--
> >  include/linux/kvm_types.h                            | 1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xen_shinfo_test.c | 4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > index d7af40240248..6908a74ab303 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_shared_info_init(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	int idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> >  
> > -	if (gfn == GPA_INVALID) {
> > +	if (gfn == INVALID_GFN) {
> 
> Grrr!  This magic value is ABI, as "gfn == -1" yields different behavior than a
> random, garbage gfn.

Thanks Sean. But I do not get it.
May I ask why ABI usages are different?  Or is there any documentation
describing the requirement? Thanks!

>                                                                                 
> So, sadly, we can't simply introduce INVALID_GFN here, and instead need to do
> something like:
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 20522d4ba1e0..2d31caaf812c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1766,6 +1766,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr {
>                 __u8 vector;
>                 __u8 runstate_update_flag;
>                 struct {
> +#define KVM_XEN_INVALID_GFN    (~0ull)
>                         __u64 gfn;
>                 } shared_info;

I guess above policy shall also be applied for the gpa inside struct
kvm_xen_vcpu_attr. Instead of using INVALID_GPA (in patch 2), should
be like:

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 61c052d51a64..c06ef8ed9680 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1823,6 +1823,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr {
        __u16 type;
        __u16 pad[3];
        union {
+#define KVM_XEN_INVALID_GPA            (~0ull)
                __u64 gpa;
                __u64 pad[8];
                struct {

Also, xen.c should use KVM_XEN_INVALID_GPA for GPA values...

B.R.
Yu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-16  8:59 [PATCH v4 0/2] KVM: MMU: Use 'INVALID_GPA' and 'INVALID_GFN' properly Yu Zhang
2022-12-16  8:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: MMU: Introduce 'INVALID_GFN' and use it for GFN values Yu Zhang
2022-12-16 12:20   ` Michal Luczaj
2022-12-16 16:16     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-16 17:29       ` Michal Luczaj
2022-12-16 16:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-20  8:16     ` Yu Zhang [this message]
2022-12-20 19:59     ` David Woodhouse
2022-12-22 18:53       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-22 19:28         ` David Woodhouse
2022-12-22 19:50           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-16  8:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: MMU: Make the definition of 'INVALID_GPA' common Yu Zhang
2022-12-16 16:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-17  6:41   ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221220081642.2bgq7xoeswtkeuym@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).