[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/4] arm: pmu: Fix overflow checks for PMUv3p5 long counters

[Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>]

PMUv3p5 uses 64-bit counters irrespective of whether the PMU is configured
for overflowing at 32 or 64-bits. The consequence is that tests that check
the counter values after overflowing should not assume that values will be
wrapped around 32-bits: they overflow into the other half of the 64-bit
counters on PMUv3p5.

Fix tests by correctly checking overflowing-counters against the expected
64-bit value.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arm/pmu.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index cd47b14..7f0794d 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -54,10 +54,10 @@
 #define EXT_COMMON_EVENTS_LOW	0x4000
 #define EXT_COMMON_EVENTS_HIGH	0x403F
 
-#define ALL_SET			0xFFFFFFFF
-#define ALL_CLEAR		0x0
-#define PRE_OVERFLOW		0xFFFFFFF0
-#define PRE_OVERFLOW2		0xFFFFFFDC
+#define ALL_SET			0x00000000FFFFFFFFULL
+#define ALL_CLEAR		0x0000000000000000ULL
+#define PRE_OVERFLOW		0x00000000FFFFFFF0ULL
+#define PRE_OVERFLOW2		0x00000000FFFFFFDCULL
 
 #define PMU_PPI			23
 
@@ -419,6 +419,22 @@ static bool satisfy_prerequisites(uint32_t *events, unsigned int nb_events)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static uint64_t pmevcntr_mask(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Bits [63:0] are always incremented for 64-bit counters,
+	 * even if the PMU is configured to generate an overflow at
+	 * bits [31:0]
+	 *
+	 * For more details see the AArch64.IncrementEventCounter()
+	 * pseudo-code in the ARM ARM DDI 0487I.a, section J1.1.1.
+	 */
+	if (pmu.version >= ID_DFR0_PMU_V3_8_5)
+		return ~0;
+
+	return (uint32_t)~0;
+}
+
 static void test_basic_event_count(void)
 {
 	uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask;
@@ -538,6 +554,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(void)
 static void test_sw_incr(void)
 {
 	uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, SW_INCR};
+	uint64_t cntr0 = (PRE_OVERFLOW + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
 	int i;
 
 	if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
@@ -572,9 +589,8 @@ static void test_sw_incr(void)
 		write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
 
 	isb();
-	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0)  == 84, "counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR");
-	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1)  == 100,
-		"counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR");
+	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0, "counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR");
+	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 100, "counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR");
 	report_info("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld",
 		    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
 	report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
@@ -625,6 +641,8 @@ static void test_chained_counters(void)
 static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
 {
 	uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, CHAIN};
+	uint64_t cntr0 = (PRE_OVERFLOW + 100) & pmevcntr_mask();
+	uint64_t cntr1 = (ALL_SET + 1) & pmevcntr_mask();
 	int i;
 
 	if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
@@ -666,9 +684,9 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
 
 	isb();
 	report((read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3) &&
-		(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 0) &&
-		(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == 84),
-		"expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
+	       (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0) &&
+	       (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == cntr1),
+	       "expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
 	report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
 		    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
 }
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog