Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@syntacore.com>,
	Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:06:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230112100608.d7tnvhbotjfctlgk@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215170046.2010255-2-atishp@rivosinc.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:00:36AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> KVM module needs to know how many hardware counters and the counter
> width that the platform supports. Otherwise, it will not be able to show
> optimal value of virtual counters to the guest. The virtual hardware
> counters also need to have the same width as the logical hardware
> counters for simplicity. However, there shouldn't be mapping between
> virtual hardware counters and logical hardware counters. As we don't
> support hetergeneous harts or counters with different width as of now,
> the implementation relies on the counter width of the first available
> programmable counter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 3852c18..65d4aa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group *riscv_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
>  static union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *pmu_ctr_list;
>  static unsigned int riscv_pmu_irq;
>  
> +/* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */
> +unsigned long cmask;

I presume this can be static since it's not getting added to the header.
And don't we need this to be a long long for rv32? We should probably
just use u64.

> +
>  struct sbi_pmu_event_data {
>  	union {
>  		union {
> @@ -264,6 +267,37 @@ static bool pmu_sbi_ctr_is_fw(int cidx)
>  	return (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW) ? true : false;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Returns the counter width of a programmable counter and number of hardware
> + * counters. As we don't support heterneous CPUs yet, it is okay to just

heterogeneous

> + * return the counter width of the first programmable counter.
> + */
> +int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info *info;
> +	u32 hpm_width = 0, hpm_count = 0;
> +
> +	if (!cmask)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, &cmask, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> +		info = &pmu_ctr_list[i];
> +		if (!info)
> +			continue;
> +		if (!hpm_width && (info->csr != CSR_CYCLE) && (info->csr != CSR_INSTRET))

nit: No need for () around the != expressions

> +			hpm_width = info->width;
> +		if (info->type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW)
> +			hpm_count++;
> +	}
> +
> +	*hw_ctr_width = hpm_width;
> +	*num_hw_ctr = hpm_count;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info);

EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL ?

> +
>  static int pmu_sbi_ctr_get_idx(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> @@ -798,7 +832,6 @@ static void riscv_pmu_destroy(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> -	unsigned long cmask = 0;
>  	int ret = -ENODEV;
>  	int num_counters;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index e17e86a..a1c3f77 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void);
>  static inline void riscv_pmu_legacy_skip_init(void) {};
>  #endif
>  struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> +int riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(u32 *hw_ctr_width, u32 *num_hw_ctr);
> +#endif
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU */
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Thanks,
drew

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-12 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-15 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM perf support Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] RISC-V: Define helper functions expose hpm counter width and count Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:06   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-01-12 18:18     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13  7:22       ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-24 20:41         ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] RISC-V: KVM: Define a probe function for SBI extension data structures Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:21   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:19     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] RISC-V: KVM: Return correct code for hsm stop function Atish Patra
2023-01-12 10:28   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:25     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13  7:25       ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] RISC-V: KVM: Modify SBI extension handler to return SBI error code Atish Patra
2023-01-12 11:04   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:47     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-01-13  7:42       ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] RISC-V: KVM: Improve privilege mode filtering for perf Atish Patra
2022-12-15 20:17   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-15 21:10     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] RISC-V: KVM: Add skeleton support " Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:10   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:09     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI PMU extension support Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:29   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-12 18:04     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] RISC-V: KVM: Disable all hpmcounter access for VS/VU mode Atish Patra
2023-01-12 15:47   ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement trap & emulate for hpmcounters Atish Patra
2023-01-13 11:47   ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement perf support without sampling Atish Patra
2023-01-13 11:45   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-23  7:23     ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-26  0:50     ` Atish Patra
2022-12-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] RISC-V: KVM: Implement firmware events Atish Patra
2023-01-13 12:08   ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-26  3:08     ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230112100608.d7tnvhbotjfctlgk@orel \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=eric.lin@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=sergey.matyukevich@syntacore.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox