From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 9/9] lib/linux/const.h: test for `__ASSEMBLER__` as well
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:28:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117112810.2dfafabf@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfg94hzl.fsf@li-1de7cd4c-3205-11b2-a85c-d27f97db1fe1.ibm.com>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:39:58 +0100
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 18:57:57 +0100
> > Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The macro `__ASSEMBLER__` is defined with value 1 when preprocessing
> >> assembly language using gcc. [1] For s390x, we're using the preprocessor
> >> for generating our linker scripts out of assembly file and therefore we
> >> need this change.
> >>
> >> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Standard-Predefined-Macros.html
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > is this patch really needed? if so, why is it at the end of the
> > series?
>
> It was needed for some other patches… and for upcoming patches it is
> (probably) required since otherwise we cannot use macros using the _AC
> macro. So yep, it could be removed for now - and this was exactly the
> reason why I put it at the end of the series.
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
I don't see a problem adding this even if it's not used right now, but
in that case I want to know why you want to add it now :)
Just explain clearly in the patch description that this will be useful
in the future and why :)
>
> >
> >> ---
> >> lib/linux/const.h | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/linux/const.h b/lib/linux/const.h
> >> index c872bfd25e13..be114dc4a553 100644
> >> --- a/lib/linux/const.h
> >> +++ b/lib/linux/const.h
> >> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> >> * leave it unchanged in asm.
> >> */
> >>
> >> -#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> >> +#if defined(__ASSEMBLY__) || defined(__ASSEMBLER__)
> >> #define _AC(X,Y) X
> >> #define _AT(T,X) X
> >> #else
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-17 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 17:57 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/9] Some cleanup patches Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/9] .gitignore: ignore `s390x/comm.key` file Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-18 8:10 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/9] s390x/Makefile: simplify `%.hdr` target rules Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-18 8:14 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/9] s390x/Makefile: fix `*.gbin` target dependencies Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 18:20 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-18 8:19 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-18 8:37 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/9] s390x/Makefile: refactor CPPFLAGS Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/9] s390x/Makefile: remove unused include path Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 18:20 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/9] s390x: define a macro for the stack frame size Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-18 8:27 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-18 9:04 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/9] s390x: use C pre-processor for linker script generation Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 18:22 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-17 9:43 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-17 10:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-17 11:19 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-17 11:21 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] s390x: use STACK_FRAME_SIZE macro in linker scripts Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 18:23 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-18 9:10 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 17:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 9/9] lib/linux/const.h: test for `__ASSEMBLER__` as well Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-16 18:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-17 9:39 ` Marc Hartmayer
2023-01-17 10:28 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230117112810.2dfafabf@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox