public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kechen Lu <kechenl@nvidia.com>
To: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>, <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	<shaoqin.huang@intel.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	<kechenl@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 1/6] KVM: x86: only allow exits disable before vCPUs created
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 02:07:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230121020738.2973-2-kechenl@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230121020738.2973-1-kechenl@nvidia.com>

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Since VMX and SVM both would never update the control bits if exits
are disable after vCPUs are created, only allow setting exits
disable flag before vCPU creation.

Fixes: 4d5422cea3b6 ("KVM: X86: Provide a capability to disable MWAIT intercepts")

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kechen Lu <kechenl@nvidia.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c             | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 9807b05a1b57..fb0fcc566d5a 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -7087,6 +7087,7 @@ branch to guests' 0x200 interrupt vector.
 :Architectures: x86
 :Parameters: args[0] defines which exits are disabled
 :Returns: 0 on success, -EINVAL when args[0] contains invalid exits
+          or if any vCPU has already been created
 
 Valid bits in args[0] are::
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index da4bbd043a7b..c8ae9c4f9f08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6227,6 +6227,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 		if (cap->args[0] & ~KVM_X86_DISABLE_VALID_EXITS)
 			break;
 
+		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+		if (kvm->created_vcpus)
+			goto disable_exits_unlock;
+
 		if ((cap->args[0] & KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT) &&
 			kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
 			kvm->arch.mwait_in_guest = true;
@@ -6237,6 +6241,8 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 		if (cap->args[0] & KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_CSTATE)
 			kvm->arch.cstate_in_guest = true;
 		r = 0;
+disable_exits_unlock:
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 		break;
 	case KVM_CAP_MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
 		kvm->arch.guest_can_read_msr_platform_info = cap->args[0];
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-21  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-21  2:07 [RFC PATCH v6 0/6] KVM: x86: add per-vCPU exits disable capability Kechen Lu
2023-01-21  2:07 ` Kechen Lu [this message]
2023-01-21  7:28   ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/6] KVM: x86: only allow exits disable before vCPUs created Greg KH
2023-01-22  1:48     ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/6] KVM: x86: Move *_in_guest power management flags to vCPU scope Kechen Lu
2023-02-02 14:56   ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-02 19:42     ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/6] KVM: x86: Reject disabling of MWAIT interception when not allowed Kechen Lu
2023-01-31 12:11   ` Zhao Liu
2023-02-01  0:43     ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/6] KVM: x86: Let userspace re-enable previously disabled exits Kechen Lu
2023-01-30  6:19   ` Chao Gao
2023-01-30 20:25     ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 5/6] KVM: x86: add vCPU scoped toggling for " Kechen Lu
2023-01-30  6:42   ` Chao Gao
2023-01-30 20:57     ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-31  2:23       ` Chao Gao
2023-01-21  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: selftests: Add tests for VM and vCPU cap KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS Kechen Lu
2023-02-02 15:08   ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-02 20:17     ` Kechen Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230121020738.2973-2-kechenl@nvidia.com \
    --to=kechenl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox