From: Kechen Lu <kechenl@nvidia.com>
To: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>, <chao.gao@intel.com>,
<shaoqin.huang@intel.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
<kechenl@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 3/6] KVM: x86: Reject disabling of MWAIT interception when not allowed
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 02:07:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230121020738.2973-4-kechenl@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230121020738.2973-1-kechenl@nvidia.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reject KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS if userspace attempts to disable MWAIT
exits and KVM previously reported (via KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION) that MWAIT is
not allowed in guest, e.g. because it's not supported or the CPU doesn't
have an aways-running APIC timer.
Fixes: 4d5422cea3b6 ("KVM: X86: Provide a capability to disable MWAIT intercepts")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kechen Lu <kechenl@nvidia.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9a77b55142c6..60caa3fd40e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4326,6 +4326,16 @@ static inline bool kvm_can_mwait_in_guest(void)
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT);
}
+static u64 kvm_get_allowed_disable_exits(void)
+{
+ u64 r = KVM_X86_DISABLE_VALID_EXITS;
+
+ if (!kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
+ r &= ~KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT;
+
+ return r;
+}
+
static int kvm_ioctl_get_supported_hv_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_cpuid2 __user *cpuid_arg)
{
@@ -4448,10 +4458,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
r = KVM_CLOCK_VALID_FLAGS;
break;
case KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS:
- r |= KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT | KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE |
- KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_CSTATE;
- if(kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
- r |= KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT;
+ r |= kvm_get_allowed_disable_exits();
break;
case KVM_CAP_X86_SMM:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_SMM))
@@ -6224,15 +6231,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
break;
case KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS:
r = -EINVAL;
- if (cap->args[0] & ~KVM_X86_DISABLE_VALID_EXITS)
+ if (cap->args[0] & ~kvm_get_allowed_disable_exits())
break;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
if (kvm->created_vcpus)
goto disable_exits_unlock;
- if ((cap->args[0] & KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT) &&
- kvm_can_mwait_in_guest())
+ if (cap->args[0] & KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT)
kvm->arch.mwait_in_guest = true;
if (cap->args[0] & KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT)
kvm->arch.hlt_in_guest = true;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-21 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-21 2:07 [RFC PATCH v6 0/6] KVM: x86: add per-vCPU exits disable capability Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/6] KVM: x86: only allow exits disable before vCPUs created Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 7:28 ` Greg KH
2023-01-22 1:48 ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/6] KVM: x86: Move *_in_guest power management flags to vCPU scope Kechen Lu
2023-02-02 14:56 ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-02 19:42 ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 2:07 ` Kechen Lu [this message]
2023-01-31 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/6] KVM: x86: Reject disabling of MWAIT interception when not allowed Zhao Liu
2023-02-01 0:43 ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/6] KVM: x86: Let userspace re-enable previously disabled exits Kechen Lu
2023-01-30 6:19 ` Chao Gao
2023-01-30 20:25 ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-21 2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 5/6] KVM: x86: add vCPU scoped toggling for " Kechen Lu
2023-01-30 6:42 ` Chao Gao
2023-01-30 20:57 ` Kechen Lu
2023-01-31 2:23 ` Chao Gao
2023-01-21 2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: selftests: Add tests for VM and vCPU cap KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS Kechen Lu
2023-02-02 15:08 ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-02 20:17 ` Kechen Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230121020738.2973-4-kechenl@nvidia.com \
--to=kechenl@nvidia.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox