From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/2] arm/psci: Test that CPU 1 has been successfully brought online
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:43:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230131064337.6w73gj3inijbo3yb@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127175916.65389-2-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 05:59:15PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> For the PSCI CPU_ON function test, all other CPUs perform a CPU_ON call
> that target CPU 1. The test is considered a success if CPU_ON returns PSCI
> SUCCESS exactly once, and for the rest of the calls PSCI ALREADY_ON.
>
> Enhance the test by checking that CPU 1 is actually online and able to
> execute code. Also make the test more robust by checking that the CPU_ON
> call returns, instead of assuming that it will always succeed and
> hanging indefinitely if it doesn't.
>
> Since the CPU 1 thread is now being set up properly by kvm-unit-tests
> when being brought online, it becomes possible to add other tests in the
> future that require all CPUs.
>
> The include header order in arm/psci.c has been changed to be in
> alphabetic order. This means moving the errata.h include before
> libcflat.h, which causes compilation to fail because of missing includes
> in errata.h. Fix that also by including the needed header in errata.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> ---
> arm/psci.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> lib/arm/asm/smp.h | 9 ++++++-
> lib/arm/smp.c | 4 ---
> lib/errata.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/psci.c b/arm/psci.c
> index efa0722c0566..f7238f8e0bbd 100644
> --- a/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/arm/psci.c
> @@ -7,11 +7,14 @@
> *
> * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> */
> -#include <libcflat.h>
> #include <errata.h>
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/delay.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> -#include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/psci.h>
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
>
> static bool invalid_function_exception;
>
> @@ -72,46 +75,84 @@ static int cpu_on_ret[NR_CPUS];
> static cpumask_t cpu_on_ready, cpu_on_done;
> static volatile int cpu_on_start;
>
> -static void cpu_on_secondary_entry(void)
> +extern void secondary_entry(void);
> +static void cpu_on_do_wake_target(void)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_on_ready);
> while (!cpu_on_start)
> cpu_relax();
> - cpu_on_ret[cpu] = psci_cpu_on(cpus[1], __pa(halt));
> + cpu_on_ret[cpu] = psci_cpu_on(cpus[1], __pa(secondary_entry));
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_on_done);
> }
>
> +static void cpu_on_target(void)
> +{
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_on_done);
> +}
> +
> +extern struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> +
> +/* Open code the setup part from smp_boot_secondary(). */
> +static void psci_cpu_on_prepare_secondary(int cpu, secondary_entry_fn entry)
> +{
> + secondary_data.stack = thread_stack_alloc();
> + secondary_data.entry = entry;
> + mmu_mark_disabled(cpu);
> +}
> +
> static bool psci_cpu_on_test(void)
> {
> bool failed = false;
> int ret_success = 0;
> - int cpu;
> -
> - cpumask_set_cpu(1, &cpu_on_ready);
> - cpumask_set_cpu(1, &cpu_on_done);
> + int i, cpu;
>
> for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> if (cpu < 2)
> continue;
> - smp_boot_secondary(cpu, cpu_on_secondary_entry);
> + smp_boot_secondary(cpu, cpu_on_do_wake_target);
> }
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(0, &cpu_on_ready);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(1, &cpu_on_ready);
> while (!cpumask_full(&cpu_on_ready))
> cpu_relax();
>
> + /*
> + * Configure CPU 1 after all secondaries are online to avoid
> + * secondary_data being overwritten.
> + */
> + psci_cpu_on_prepare_secondary(1, cpu_on_target);
> +
> cpu_on_start = 1;
> smp_mb();
>
> - cpu_on_ret[0] = psci_cpu_on(cpus[1], __pa(halt));
> + cpu_on_ret[0] = psci_cpu_on(cpus[1], __pa(secondary_entry));
> cpumask_set_cpu(0, &cpu_on_done);
>
> - while (!cpumask_full(&cpu_on_done))
> - cpu_relax();
> + report_info("waiting for CPU1 to come online...");
> + for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> + mdelay(10);
> + if (cpumask_full(&cpu_on_done))
> + break;
> + }
>
> - for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (!cpumask_full(&cpu_on_done)) {
> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpu_on_done)) {
> + if (cpu == 1)
> + report_info("CPU1 failed to come online");
> + else
> + report_info("CPU%d failed to online CPU1", cpu);
> + }
> + }
> + failed = true;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_on_done) {
> if (cpu == 1)
> continue;
> if (cpu_on_ret[cpu] == PSCI_RET_SUCCESS) {
> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/smp.h b/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
> index 077afde85520..dee4c1a883e7 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/smp.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,14 @@
>
> #define smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
>
> +typedef void (*secondary_entry_fn)(void);
> +
> +struct secondary_data {
> + void *stack; /* must be first member of struct */
> + secondary_entry_fn entry;
> +};
> +extern struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> +
> extern bool cpu0_calls_idle;
>
> extern void halt(void);
> @@ -48,7 +56,6 @@ static inline void set_cpu_idle(int cpu, bool idle)
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_idle_mask);
> }
>
> -typedef void (*secondary_entry_fn)(void);
> extern void smp_boot_secondary(int cpu, secondary_entry_fn entry);
> extern void on_cpu_async(int cpu, void (*func)(void *data), void *data);
> extern void on_cpu(int cpu, void (*func)(void *data), void *data);
> diff --git a/lib/arm/smp.c b/lib/arm/smp.c
> index 98a5054e039b..1d470d1aab45 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/arm/smp.c
> @@ -21,10 +21,6 @@ cpumask_t cpu_present_mask;
> cpumask_t cpu_online_mask;
> cpumask_t cpu_idle_mask;
>
> -struct secondary_data {
> - void *stack; /* must be first member of struct */
> - secondary_entry_fn entry;
> -};
> struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> static struct spinlock lock;
>
> diff --git a/lib/errata.h b/lib/errata.h
> index 5af0eb3bf8e2..de8205d8b370 100644
> --- a/lib/errata.h
> +++ b/lib/errata.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> */
> #ifndef _ERRATA_H_
> #define _ERRATA_H_
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +
> #include "config.h"
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_ERRATA_FORCE
> --
> 2.39.0
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 17:59 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/2] arm: Add PSCI CPU_OFF test Alexandru Elisei
2023-01-27 17:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/2] arm/psci: Test that CPU 1 has been successfully brought online Alexandru Elisei
2023-01-31 6:43 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-01-27 17:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/2] arm/psci: Add PSCI CPU_OFF test case Alexandru Elisei
2023-01-31 6:56 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-31 9:52 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-01-31 10:46 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-31 11:16 ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-01-31 11:45 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-31 11:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230131064337.6w73gj3inijbo3yb@orel \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox