From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:32:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317133253.965010-2-nsg@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317133253.965010-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Replace explicit psw definition by PSW macro.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/spec_ex.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex.c b/s390x/spec_ex.c
index 42ecaed3..2adc5996 100644
--- a/s390x/spec_ex.c
+++ b/s390x/spec_ex.c
@@ -105,10 +105,7 @@ static int check_invalid_psw(void)
/* For normal PSWs bit 12 has to be 0 to be a valid PSW*/
static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
{
- struct psw invalid = {
- .mask = BIT(63 - 12),
- .addr = 0x00000000deadbeee
- };
+ struct psw invalid = PSW(BIT(63 - 12), 0x00000000deadbeee);
expect_invalid_psw(invalid);
load_psw(invalid);
@@ -118,10 +115,7 @@ static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
/* A short PSW needs to have bit 12 set to be valid. */
static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
{
- struct psw invalid = {
- .mask = BIT(63 - 12),
- .addr = 0x00000000deadbeee
- };
+ struct psw invalid = PSW(BIT(63 - 12), 0x00000000deadbeee);
struct short_psw short_invalid = {
.mask = 0x0,
.addr = 0xdeadbeee
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 13:32 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-17 13:32 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-03-17 13:32 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-17 13:32 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-03 15:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 8:57 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230317133253.965010-2-nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox