From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/5] lib: s390x: ap: Add ap_setup
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:40:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330184042.11ea308c@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330114244.35559-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:42:42 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> For the next tests we need a valid queue which means we need to grab
> the qci info and search the first set bit in the ap and aq masks.
>
> Let's move from the ap_check function to a proper setup function that
> also returns the first usable APQN. Later we can extend the setup to
> build a list of all available APQNs but right now one APQN is plenty.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/ap.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/s390x/ap.h | 5 ++++-
> s390x/ap.c | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/ap.c b/lib/s390x/ap.c
> index 374fa210..8d7f2992 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/ap.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/ap.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@
>
> #include <libcflat.h>
> #include <interrupt.h>
> +#include <bitops.h>
> #include <ap.h>
> #include <asm/time.h>
>
> +static struct ap_config_info qci;
> +
> int ap_pqap_tapq(uint8_t ap, uint8_t qn, struct ap_queue_status *apqsw,
> struct pqap_r2 *r2)
> {
> @@ -77,7 +80,44 @@ int ap_pqap_qci(struct ap_config_info *info)
> return cc;
> }
>
> -bool ap_check(void)
> +static int ap_get_apqn(uint8_t *ap, uint8_t *qn)
> +{
> + unsigned long *ptr;
> + uint8_t bit;
> + int i;
> +
> + ap_pqap_qci(&qci);
> + *ap = 0;
> + *qn = 0;
> +
> + ptr = (unsigned long *)qci.apm;
here it would be nice if qci.apm were an array of longs (as I wrote in
the first patch)
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + bit = fls(*ptr);
fls is implemented using __builtin_clzl, which has undefined behaviour
if the input is all 0
one idea would be to abstract this and write a function that returns
the first bit set in a bit array of arbitrary size
otherwise something like:
for (i = 0; i < 4 && !*ptr; i++);
if (i >= 4)
return -1;
*ap = 64 * i + 63 - fls(*ptr);
> + if (bit) {
> + *ap = i * 64 + 64 - bit;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + ptr = (unsigned long *)qci.aqm;
same here
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + bit = fls(*ptr);
> + if (bit) {
> + *qn = i * 64 + 64 - bit;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!*ap || !*qn)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* fls returns 1 + bit number, so we need to remove 1 here */
not really, you did 64 - fls() instead of 63 - fls() (but see my
comment above)
> + *ap -= 1;
> + *qn -= 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool ap_check(void)
> {
> struct ap_queue_status r1 = {};
> struct pqap_r2 r2 = {};
> @@ -91,3 +131,15 @@ bool ap_check(void)
>
> return true;
> }
> +
> +int ap_setup(uint8_t *ap, uint8_t *qn)
> +{
> + if (!ap_check())
> + return AP_SETUP_NOINSTR;
> +
> + /* Instructions available but no APQNs */
> + if (ap_get_apqn(ap, qn))
> + return AP_SETUP_NOAPQN;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/ap.h b/lib/s390x/ap.h
> index 79fe6eb0..59595eba 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/ap.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/ap.h
> @@ -79,7 +79,10 @@ struct pqap_r2 {
> } __attribute__((packed)) __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> _Static_assert(sizeof(struct pqap_r2) == sizeof(uint64_t), "pqap_r2 size");
>
> -bool ap_check(void);
> +#define AP_SETUP_NOINSTR -1
> +#define AP_SETUP_NOAPQN 1
this is rather ugly, maybe make it an enum?
AP_SETUP_OK = 0,
AP_SETUP_NOAPQN,
AP_SETUP_NOINSTR
> +
> +int ap_setup(uint8_t *ap, uint8_t *qn);
> int ap_pqap_tapq(uint8_t ap, uint8_t qn, struct ap_queue_status *apqsw,
> struct pqap_r2 *r2);
> int ap_pqap_qci(struct ap_config_info *info);
> diff --git a/s390x/ap.c b/s390x/ap.c
> index 82ddb6d2..20b4e76e 100644
> --- a/s390x/ap.c
> +++ b/s390x/ap.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
> #include <asm/time.h>
> #include <ap.h>
>
> +static uint8_t apn;
> +static uint8_t qn;
> +
> /* For PQAP PGM checks where we need full control over the input */
> static void pqap(unsigned long grs[3])
> {
> @@ -291,8 +294,10 @@ static void test_priv(void)
>
> int main(void)
> {
> + int setup_rc = ap_setup(&apn, &qn);
> +
> report_prefix_push("ap");
> - if (!ap_check()) {
> + if (setup_rc == AP_SETUP_NOINSTR) {
> report_skip("AP instructions not available");
> goto done;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 11:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/5] s390x: Add base AP support Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 11:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/5] lib: s390x: Add ap library Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 16:09 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-31 7:32 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 11:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/5] s390x: Add guest 2 AP test Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 16:34 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-31 8:52 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 11:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/5] lib: s390x: ap: Add ap_setup Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 16:40 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2023-03-30 11:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/5] s390x: ap: Add pqap aqic tests Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 16:44 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-30 11:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/5] s390x: ap: Add reset tests Janosch Frank
2023-03-30 16:48 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-03 14:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-04 11:40 ` Janosch Frank
2023-04-04 15:23 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230330184042.11ea308c@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox