* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests
@ 2023-04-04 8:54 Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2023-04-04 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudio Imbrenda, Janosch Frank, Thomas Huth
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Instructions on s390 must be halfword aligned.
Add two tests for that.
v4 -> v5:
* fix miscompile due to missing barrier (thanks Thomas & Janosch)
* fix issues with clang (thanks Thomas)
v3 -> v4:
* zero whole register with xgr (thanks Janosch)
* pick up tags (thanks Janosch)
v2 -> v3:
* pick up R-b (thanks Janosch)
* use br instead of bcr (thanks Claudio)
* use text section instead of rodata for ex target (thanks Claudio)
* fix label position (thanks Claudio)
v1 -> v2:
* rebase
* use PSW macros
* simplify odd psw test (thanks Claudio)
* rename some identifiers
* pick up R-b (thanks Claudio)
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (3):
s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
s390x/spec_ex.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Range-diff against v4:
1: c00f8aa2 = 1: cdfa2083 s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
2: d9e3f6e0 ! 2: 5bf32702 s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
return check_invalid_psw();
}
-+extern char misaligned_code[];
++extern char misaligned_code_pre[];
+asm ( ".balign 2\n"
++"misaligned_code_pre:\n"
+" . = . + 1\n"
-+"misaligned_code:\n"
+" larl %r0,0\n"
+" br %r1\n"
+);
+
+static int psw_odd_address(void)
+{
-+ struct psw odd = PSW_WITH_CUR_MASK((uint64_t)&misaligned_code);
++ struct psw odd = PSW_WITH_CUR_MASK(((uint64_t)&misaligned_code_pre) + 1);
+ uint64_t executed_addr;
+
+ expect_invalid_psw(odd);
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
+ : [fixup_addr] "=&T" (fixup_psw.addr),
+ [executed_addr] "=d" (executed_addr)
+ : [odd_psw] "Q" (odd)
-+ : "cc", "%r0", "%r1"
++ : "cc", "%r0", "%r1", "memory" /* Compiler barrier like in load_psw */
+ );
+
+ if (!executed_addr) {
3: 7ea75611 ! 3: 14af5979 s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
+
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.ex_odd\n"
+ " .balign 2\n"
-+ "pre_odd_ex_target:\n"
++ "pre_odd_ex_target%=:\n"
+ " . = . + 1\n"
+ " lr %[to],%[from]\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
-+ " larl %[pre_target_addr],pre_odd_ex_target\n"
++ " larl %[pre_target_addr],pre_odd_ex_target%=\n"
+ " ex 0,1(%[pre_target_addr])\n"
+ : [pre_target_addr] "=&a" (pre_target_addr),
+ [to] "+d" (to)
base-commit: 5b5d27da2973b20ec29b18df4d749fb2190458af
--
2.37.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
2023-04-04 8:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 8:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 9:38 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2023-04-04 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Replace explicit psw definition by PSW macro.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/spec_ex.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex.c b/s390x/spec_ex.c
index 42ecaed3..2adc5996 100644
--- a/s390x/spec_ex.c
+++ b/s390x/spec_ex.c
@@ -105,10 +105,7 @@ static int check_invalid_psw(void)
/* For normal PSWs bit 12 has to be 0 to be a valid PSW*/
static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
{
- struct psw invalid = {
- .mask = BIT(63 - 12),
- .addr = 0x00000000deadbeee
- };
+ struct psw invalid = PSW(BIT(63 - 12), 0x00000000deadbeee);
expect_invalid_psw(invalid);
load_psw(invalid);
@@ -118,10 +115,7 @@ static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
/* A short PSW needs to have bit 12 set to be valid. */
static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
{
- struct psw invalid = {
- .mask = BIT(63 - 12),
- .addr = 0x00000000deadbeee
- };
+ struct psw invalid = PSW(BIT(63 - 12), 0x00000000deadbeee);
struct short_psw short_invalid = {
.mask = 0x0,
.addr = 0xdeadbeee
--
2.37.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
2023-04-04 8:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 8:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 9:59 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2023-04-04 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Instructions on s390 must be halfword aligned.
Introducing an odd instruction address into the PSW leads to a
specification exception when attempting to execute the instruction at
the odd address.
Add a test for this.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/spec_ex.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex.c b/s390x/spec_ex.c
index 2adc5996..494d94cc 100644
--- a/s390x/spec_ex.c
+++ b/s390x/spec_ex.c
@@ -88,12 +88,23 @@ static void expect_invalid_psw(struct psw psw)
invalid_psw_expected = true;
}
+static void clear_invalid_psw(void)
+{
+ expected_psw = PSW(0, 0);
+ invalid_psw_expected = false;
+}
+
static int check_invalid_psw(void)
{
/* Since the fixup sets this to false we check for false here. */
if (!invalid_psw_expected) {
+ /*
+ * Early exception recognition: pgm_int_id == 0.
+ * Late exception recognition: psw address has been
+ * incremented by pgm_int_id (unpredictable value)
+ */
if (expected_psw.mask == invalid_psw.mask &&
- expected_psw.addr == invalid_psw.addr)
+ expected_psw.addr == invalid_psw.addr - lowcore.pgm_int_id)
return 0;
report_fail("Wrong invalid PSW");
} else {
@@ -112,6 +123,42 @@ static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
return check_invalid_psw();
}
+extern char misaligned_code_pre[];
+asm ( ".balign 2\n"
+"misaligned_code_pre:\n"
+" . = . + 1\n"
+" larl %r0,0\n"
+" br %r1\n"
+);
+
+static int psw_odd_address(void)
+{
+ struct psw odd = PSW_WITH_CUR_MASK(((uint64_t)&misaligned_code_pre) + 1);
+ uint64_t executed_addr;
+
+ expect_invalid_psw(odd);
+ fixup_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ asm volatile ( "xgr %%r0,%%r0\n"
+ " larl %%r1,0f\n"
+ " stg %%r1,%[fixup_addr]\n"
+ " lpswe %[odd_psw]\n"
+ "0: lr %[executed_addr],%%r0\n"
+ : [fixup_addr] "=&T" (fixup_psw.addr),
+ [executed_addr] "=d" (executed_addr)
+ : [odd_psw] "Q" (odd)
+ : "cc", "%r0", "%r1", "memory" /* Compiler barrier like in load_psw */
+ );
+
+ if (!executed_addr) {
+ return check_invalid_psw();
+ } else {
+ assert(executed_addr == odd.addr);
+ clear_invalid_psw();
+ report_fail("did not execute unaligned instructions");
+ return 1;
+ }
+}
+
/* A short PSW needs to have bit 12 set to be valid. */
static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
{
@@ -170,6 +217,7 @@ struct spec_ex_trigger {
static const struct spec_ex_trigger spec_ex_triggers[] = {
{ "psw_bit_12_is_1", &psw_bit_12_is_1, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
{ "short_psw_bit_12_is_0", &short_psw_bit_12_is_0, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
+ { "psw_odd_address", &psw_odd_address, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
{ "bad_alignment", &bad_alignment, true, NULL },
{ "not_even", ¬_even, true, NULL },
{ NULL, NULL, false, NULL },
--
2.37.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
2023-04-04 8:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 8:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 10:00 ` Nico Boehr
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2023-04-04 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
The EXECUTE instruction executes the instruction at the given target
address. This address must be halfword aligned, otherwise a
specification exception occurs.
Add a test for this.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/spec_ex.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex.c b/s390x/spec_ex.c
index 494d94cc..e5f7b12f 100644
--- a/s390x/spec_ex.c
+++ b/s390x/spec_ex.c
@@ -177,6 +177,30 @@ static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
return 0;
}
+static int odd_ex_target(void)
+{
+ uint64_t pre_target_addr;
+ int to = 0, from = 0x0dd;
+
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.ex_odd\n"
+ " .balign 2\n"
+ "pre_odd_ex_target%=:\n"
+ " . = . + 1\n"
+ " lr %[to],%[from]\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " larl %[pre_target_addr],pre_odd_ex_target%=\n"
+ " ex 0,1(%[pre_target_addr])\n"
+ : [pre_target_addr] "=&a" (pre_target_addr),
+ [to] "+d" (to)
+ : [from] "d" (from)
+ );
+
+ assert((pre_target_addr + 1) & 1);
+ report(to != from, "did not perform ex with odd target");
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int bad_alignment(void)
{
uint32_t words[5] __attribute__((aligned(16)));
@@ -218,6 +242,7 @@ static const struct spec_ex_trigger spec_ex_triggers[] = {
{ "psw_bit_12_is_1", &psw_bit_12_is_1, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
{ "short_psw_bit_12_is_0", &short_psw_bit_12_is_0, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
{ "psw_odd_address", &psw_odd_address, false, &fixup_invalid_psw },
+ { "odd_ex_target", &odd_ex_target, true, NULL },
{ "bad_alignment", &bad_alignment, true, NULL },
{ "not_even", ¬_even, true, NULL },
{ NULL, NULL, false, NULL },
--
2.37.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 9:38 ` Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2023-04-04 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudio Imbrenda, Janosch Frank, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch,
Thomas Huth
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Quoting Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (2023-04-04 10:54:51)
> Replace explicit psw definition by PSW macro.
> No functional change intended.
>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 9:59 ` Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2023-04-04 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudio Imbrenda, Janosch Frank, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch,
Thomas Huth
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Quoting Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (2023-04-04 10:54:52)
> Instructions on s390 must be halfword aligned.
> Introducing an odd instruction address into the PSW leads to a
> specification exception when attempting to execute the instruction at
> the odd address.
> Add a test for this.
>
> Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
and
Tested-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
under RHEL.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-04-04 10:00 ` Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2023-04-04 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudio Imbrenda, Janosch Frank, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch,
Thomas Huth
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Quoting Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (2023-04-04 10:54:53)
> The EXECUTE instruction executes the instruction at the given target
> address. This address must be halfword aligned, otherwise a
> specification exception occurs.
> Add a test for this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-04 10:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-04 8:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/3] s390x: Add misaligned instruction tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 9:38 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 9:59 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-04 8:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-04 10:00 ` Nico Boehr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox