public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Add documentation for fixed ctr on PMU filter
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:00:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414110056.19665-5-cloudliang@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414110056.19665-1-cloudliang@tencent.com>

From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>

Update the documentation for the KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER ioctl
to include a detailed description of how fixed performance events
are handled in the pmu filter. The action and fixed_counter_bitmap
members of the pmu filter to determine whether fixed performance
events can be programmed by the guest. This information is helpful
for correctly configuring the fixed_counter_bitmap and action fields
to filter fixed performance events.

Suggested-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index a69e91088d76..036f5b1a39af 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -5122,6 +5122,27 @@ Valid values for 'action'::
   #define KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW 0
   #define KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY 1
 
+Via this API, KVM userspace can also control the behavior of the VM's fixed
+counters (if any) by configuring the "action" and "fixed_counter_bitmap" fields.
+
+Specifically, KVM follows the following pseudo-code when determining whether to
+allow the guest FixCtr[i] to count its pre-defined fixed event:
+
+  FixCtr[i]_is_allowed = (action == ALLOW) && (bitmap & BIT(i)) ||
+    (action == DENY) && !(bitmap & BIT(i));
+  FixCtr[i]_is_denied = !FixCtr[i]_is_allowed;
+
+Note once this API interface is called, the default zero value of the field
+"fixed_counter_bitmap" will implicitly affect all fixed counters, even if it's
+expected to be used only to control the events on generic counters.
+
+In addition, pre-defined performance events on the fixed counters already have
+event_select and unit_mask values defined, which means userspace can also
+control fixed counters by configuring "action"+ "events" fields.
+
+When there is a contradiction between these two polices, the fixed performance
+counter will only follow the rule of the pseudo-code above.
+
 4.121 KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF
 ---------------------
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-14 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14 11:00 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: selftests: Add tests for pmu event filter Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: selftests: Replace int with uint32_t for nevents Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: selftests: Apply create_pmu_event_filter() to fixed ctrs Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: selftests: Test unavailable event filters are rejected Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` Jinrong Liang [this message]
2023-04-15  0:53   ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Add documentation for fixed ctr on PMU filter kernel test robot
2023-04-15  3:24   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-04-16  0:25     ` Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: selftests: Check if pmu_event_filter meets expectations on fixed ctrs Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: selftests: Check gp event filters without affecting fixed event filters Jinrong Liang
2023-04-14 11:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test pmu event filter with incompatible kvm_pmu_event_filter Jinrong Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230414110056.19665-5-cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --to=ljr.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox