* [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic
@ 2023-04-25 11:39 Uros Bizjak
2023-05-26 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Uros Bizjak @ 2023-04-25 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-kernel
Cc: Uros Bizjak, Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, David Matlack
Commit aee98a6838d5 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use try_cmpxchg64 in
tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic") removed the comment that iter->old_spte is
updated when different logical CPU modifies the page table entry.
Although this is what try_cmpxchg does implicitly, it won't hurt
if this fact is explicitly mentioned in a restored comment.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 7c25dbf32ecc..5d126b015086 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -655,8 +655,16 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
* Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
* does not hold the mmu_lock.
*/
- if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
+ if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte)) {
+ /*
+ * The page table entry was modified by a different logical
+ * CPU. In this case the above try_cmpxchg updates
+ * iter->old_spte with the current value, so the caller
+ * operates on fresh data, e.g. if it retries
+ * tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic().
+ */
return -EBUSY;
+ }
__handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
new_spte, iter->level, true);
--
2.40.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic
2023-04-25 11:39 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic Uros Bizjak
@ 2023-05-26 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2023-05-26 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uros Bizjak; +Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, David Matlack
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Commit aee98a6838d5 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use try_cmpxchg64 in
> tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic") removed the comment that iter->old_spte is
> updated when different logical CPU modifies the page table entry.
> Although this is what try_cmpxchg does implicitly, it won't hurt
> if this fact is explicitly mentioned in a restored comment.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 7c25dbf32ecc..5d126b015086 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -655,8 +655,16 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
> * Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
> * does not hold the mmu_lock.
> */
> - if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
> + if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte)) {
> + /*
> + * The page table entry was modified by a different logical
> + * CPU. In this case the above try_cmpxchg updates
> + * iter->old_spte with the current value, so the caller
> + * operates on fresh data, e.g. if it retries
> + * tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic().
> + */
If there's no objection, when applying I'll massage this to extend the comment
above the try_cmpxchg64(), e.g.
/*
* Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
* does not hold the mmu_lock. On failure, i.e. if a different logical
* CPU modified the SPTE, try_cmpxchg64() updates iter->old_spte with
* the current value, so the caller operates on fresh data, e.g. if it
* retries tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic()
*/
if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
return -EBUSY;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic
2023-04-25 11:39 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic Uros Bizjak
2023-05-26 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
@ 2023-06-02 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2023-06-02 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, kvm, linux-kernel, Uros Bizjak
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, David Matlack
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:39:32 +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Commit aee98a6838d5 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use try_cmpxchg64 in
> tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic") removed the comment that iter->old_spte is
> updated when different logical CPU modifies the page table entry.
> Although this is what try_cmpxchg does implicitly, it won't hurt
> if this fact is explicitly mentioned in a restored comment.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 mmu, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/12ced095956a
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-02 1:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-25 11:39 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on try_cmpxchg64 usage in tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic Uros Bizjak
2023-05-26 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).