public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	kai.huang@intel.com, robert.hu@linux.intel.com,
	binbin.wu@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 14:06:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230510060611.12950-2-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230510060611.12950-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Define a 32-bit parameter and consolidate the two bools into it.

__linearize() has two bool parameters write and fetch. And new flag
will be needed to support new feature (e.g. LAM needs a flag to skip
address untag under some conditions).

No functional change intended.

In the follow-up patches, the new parameter will be extended for LAM.

Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c     | 19 +++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 936a397a08cd..9508836e8a35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static unsigned insn_alignment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned size)
 static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 				       struct segmented_address addr,
 				       unsigned *max_size, unsigned size,
-				       bool write, bool fetch,
-				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear)
+				       u32 flags, enum x86emul_mode mode,
+				       ulong *linear)
 {
 	struct desc_struct desc;
 	bool usable;
@@ -696,6 +696,8 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	u32 lim;
 	u16 sel;
 	u8  va_bits;
+	bool fetch = !!(flags & X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
+	bool write = !!(flags & X86EMUL_F_WRITE);
 
 	la = seg_base(ctxt, addr.seg) + addr.ea;
 	*max_size = 0;
@@ -757,7 +759,11 @@ static int linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		     ulong *linear)
 {
 	unsigned max_size;
-	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, write, false,
+	u32 flags = 0;
+
+	if (write)
+		flags |= X86EMUL_F_WRITE;
+	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, flags,
 			   ctxt->mode, linear);
 }
 
@@ -768,10 +774,11 @@ static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
 	unsigned max_size;
 	struct segmented_address addr = { .seg = VCPU_SREG_CS,
 					   .ea = dst };
+	u32 flags = X86EMUL_F_FETCH;
 
 	if (ctxt->op_bytes != sizeof(unsigned long))
 		addr.ea = dst & ((1UL << (ctxt->op_bytes << 3)) - 1);
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, false, true, ctxt->mode, &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, flags, ctxt->mode, &linear);
 	if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		ctxt->_eip = addr.ea;
 	return rc;
@@ -896,6 +903,7 @@ static int __do_insn_fetch_bytes(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int op_size)
 	int cur_size = ctxt->fetch.end - ctxt->fetch.data;
 	struct segmented_address addr = { .seg = VCPU_SREG_CS,
 					   .ea = ctxt->eip + cur_size };
+	u32 flags = X86EMUL_F_FETCH;
 
 	/*
 	 * We do not know exactly how many bytes will be needed, and
@@ -907,8 +915,7 @@ static int __do_insn_fetch_bytes(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int op_size)
 	 * boundary check itself.  Instead, we use max_size to check
 	 * against op_size.
 	 */
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, false, true, ctxt->mode,
-			 &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, flags, ctxt->mode, &linear);
 	if (unlikely(rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE))
 		return rc;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
index ab65f3a47dfd..5b9ec610b2cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ struct x86_instruction_info {
 #define X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED       5 /* IO is needed to complete emulation */
 #define X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED     6 /* Intercepted by nested VMCB/VMCS */
 
+/* x86-specific emulation flags */
+#define X86EMUL_F_FETCH			BIT(0)
+#define X86EMUL_F_WRITE			BIT(1)
+
 struct x86_emulate_ops {
 	void (*vm_bugged)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
 	/*
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10  6:06 [PATCH v8 0/6] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2023-05-10  7:42   ` [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize() Chao Gao
2023-05-11  1:25     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  9:58       ` David Laight
2023-05-12  1:35         ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10 12:41   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-11  1:30     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LAM_SUP Binbin Wu
2023-05-11 12:50   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-12  1:33     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-12 10:49       ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-18  4:01         ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR3.LAM_{U48,U57} Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  8:58   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-11  1:27     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10 11:59   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce untag_addr() in kvm_x86_ops Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  6:03   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-11  9:18     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-11 10:37       ` Chao Gao
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: x86: Untag address when LAM applicable Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  6:28   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] KVM: x86: Expose LAM feature to userspace VMM Binbin Wu
2023-05-12 12:49   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-16  3:30     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-25  2:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-05-25 15:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  9:26     ` Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230510060611.12950-2-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox