kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <lee@kernel.org>, <seanjc@google.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	<wanpengli@tencent.com>, <jmattson@google.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>,
	Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: Remove obsolete disabling of page faults in kvm_arch_vcpu_put()
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 18:15:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230510181547.22451-5-risbhat@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230510181547.22451-1-risbhat@amazon.com>

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

commit 19979fba9bfaeab427a8e106d915f0627c952828 upstream.

Remove the disabling of page faults across kvm_steal_time_set_preempted()
as KVM now accesses the steal time struct (shared with the guest) via a
cached mapping (see commit b043138246a4, "x86/KVM: Make sure
KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB flag is not missed".)  The cache lookup is flagged as
atomic, thus it would be a bug if KVM tried to resolve a new pfn, i.e.
we want the splat that would be reached via might_fault().

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210123000334.3123628-2-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index b0379ff4b743..4e77233880b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4127,15 +4127,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (vcpu->preempted)
 		vcpu->arch.preempted_in_kernel = !kvm_x86_ops.get_cpl(vcpu);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable page faults because we're in atomic context here.
-	 * kvm_write_guest_offset_cached() would call might_fault()
-	 * that relies on pagefault_disable() to tell if there's a
-	 * bug. NOTE: the write to guest memory may not go through if
-	 * during postcopy live migration or if there's heavy guest
-	 * paging.
-	 */
-	pagefault_disable();
 	/*
 	 * kvm_memslots() will be called by
 	 * kvm_write_guest_offset_cached() so take the srcu lock.
@@ -4143,7 +4134,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 	kvm_steal_time_set_preempted(vcpu);
 	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
-	pagefault_enable();
 	kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_put(vcpu);
 	vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc = rdtsc();
 	/*
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10 18:15 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: Ensure PV TLB flush tracepoint reflects KVM behavior Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Fix recording of guest steal time / preempted status Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` Rishabh Bhatnagar [this message]
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: do not set st->preempted when going back to user space Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: revalidate steal time cache if MSR value changes Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: do not report preemption if the steal time cache is stale Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230510181547.22451-5-risbhat@amazon.com \
    --to=risbhat@amazon.com \
    --cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).