kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	andrew.jones@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, ricarkol@google.com, reijiw@google.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] arm: pmu: Fix chain counter enable/disable sequences
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 22:03:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230619200401.1963751-5-eric.auger@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230619200401.1963751-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>

In some ARM ARM ddi0487 revisions it is said that
disabling/enabling a pair of counters that are paired
by a CHAIN event should follow a given sequence:

Enable the high counter first, isb, enable low counter
Disable the low counter first, isb, disable the high counter

This was the case in Fc. However this is not written anymore
in subsequent revions such as Ia.

Anyway, just in case, and because it also makes the code a
little bit simpler, introduce 2 helpers to enable/disable chain
counters that execute those sequences and replace the existing
PMCNTENCLR/ENSET calls (at least this cannot do any harm).

Also fix 2 write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0) in subtest 5 & 6
and replace them by PMCNTENCLR writes since writing 0 in
PMCNTENSET_EL0 has no effect. While at it, aslo removes a useless
pmevtyper setting in test_chained_sw_incr() since the type of the
counter is not reset by pmu_reset()

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

---
v2 -> v3:
- use enable_chain_counter() in test_chain_promotion() and
  test_chained_sw_incr() as well. This also fix the missing
  ISB reported by Alexandru.
- Also removes a useless pmevtyper setting in
  test_chained_sw_incr()

v1 -> v2:
- fix the enable_chain_counter()/disable_chain_counter()
  sequence, ie. swap n + 1 / n as reported by Alexandru.
- fix an other comment using the 'low' terminology
---
 arm/pmu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index 74dd4c10..0995a249 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -631,6 +631,22 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
 		"overflow on counter #0 after 100 SW_INCR");
 }
 
+static void enable_chain_counter(int even)
+{
+	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the high counter first */
+	isb();
+	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
+	isb();
+}
+
+static void disable_chain_counter(int even)
+{
+	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the low counter first*/
+	isb();
+	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the high counter */
+	isb();
+}
+
 static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
 {
 	uint32_t events[] = {CPU_CYCLES, CHAIN};
@@ -643,9 +659,8 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
 
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
-	/* enable counters #0 and #1 */
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 
 	precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 
@@ -655,10 +670,10 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
 	/* test 64b overflow */
 
 	pmu_reset();
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
 
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x1);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 	precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
 	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 2, "CHAIN counter #1 set to 2");
@@ -687,8 +702,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
 
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, SW_INCR | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
-	/* enable counters #0 and #1 */
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
 	set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
@@ -707,10 +721,9 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
 	/* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/
 	pmu_reset();
 
-	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET_32);
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 	set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	isb();
 
@@ -769,16 +782,17 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
 	/* 1st COUNT with CHAIN enabled, next COUNT with CHAIN disabled */
 	report_prefix_push("subtest3");
 	pmu_reset();
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
-	isb();
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 	PRINT_REGS("init");
 
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
 
 	/* disable the CHAIN event */
-	write_sysreg_s(0x2, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
+	disable_chain_counter(0);
+	write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
+	isb();
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
 	report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
@@ -799,9 +813,11 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
 
-	/* enable the CHAIN event */
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	/* Disable the low counter first and enable the chain counter */
+	write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
 	isb();
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
+
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 
 	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
@@ -825,10 +841,10 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
 	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
 
 	/* 0 becomes CHAINED */
-	write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x0);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
@@ -844,13 +860,13 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
-	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	enable_chain_counter(0);
 	PRINT_REGS("init");
 
 	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
 	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
 
-	write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+	disable_chain_counter(0);
 	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
 	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
 
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-19 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 20:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] arm: pmu: Fix random failures of pmu-chain-promotion Eric Auger
2023-06-19 20:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] arm: pmu: pmu-chain-promotion: Improve debug messages Eric Auger
2023-06-19 20:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] arm: pmu: pmu-chain-promotion: Introduce defines for count and margin values Eric Auger
2023-06-19 20:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] arm: pmu: Add extra DSB barriers in the mem_access loop Eric Auger
2023-06-19 20:03 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2023-06-30 15:47   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] arm: pmu: Fix chain counter enable/disable sequences Alexandru Elisei
2023-06-19 20:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] arm: pmu: Add pmu-mem-access-reliability test Eric Auger
2023-06-30 16:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-06-30 17:15     ` Eric Auger
2023-07-01 11:36   ` Andrew Jones
2023-07-03  8:08     ` Eric Auger
2023-06-19 20:04 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] arm: pmu-chain-promotion: Increase the count and margin values Eric Auger
2023-06-28  7:44 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] arm: pmu: Fix random failures of pmu-chain-promotion Eric Auger
2023-06-28 10:18   ` Alexandru Elisei
2023-06-28 11:45     ` Eric Auger
2023-07-01 12:20 ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230619200401.1963751-5-eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).