public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	erdemaktas@google.com, Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>,
	chen.bo@intel.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: guest memory: Misc enhacnement
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:54:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230626205445.GD3436214@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJY0Nudy8ym2kKNg@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:09:26PM -0700,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> > * VM type: Now we have KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM. How do we proceed?
> >   - Keep KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for its use. Introduce KVM_X86_TDX_VM
> >   - Use KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for TDX. (If necessary, introduce another type in
> >     the future)
> 
> How would KVM differentiate between software-protected VMs and TDX VMs if we go
> with this option?

Let's introduce new two VM type.  I'm fine with two new VM types.  I had KVM
capability in mind if SEV implementation doesn't like new VM types.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-26 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-15 20:12 [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: guest memory: Misc enhacnement isaku.yamahata
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] KVM: selftests: Fix test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions() isaku.yamahata
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] KVM: selftests: Fix guest_memfd() isaku.yamahata
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass round full 64-bit error code for the KVM page fault isaku.yamahata
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to indicate fault is private isaku.yamahata
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] KVM: Add flags to struct kvm_gfn_range isaku.yamahata
2023-06-20 16:28   ` Michael Roth
2023-06-20 19:04     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-06-23 19:37       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-15 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback isaku.yamahata
2023-06-19 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: guest memory: Misc enhacnement Vishal Annapurve
2023-06-19 20:11   ` Zhi Wang
2023-06-19 21:55     ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-06-21  8:16       ` Zhi Wang
2023-06-21 18:19       ` Dong, Eddie
2023-06-21 20:46         ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-06-24  0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-26 20:54   ` Isaku Yamahata [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230626205445.GD3436214@ls.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chen.bo@intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox