public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:18:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718131844.5706-2-guang.zeng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718131844.5706-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>

From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Consolidate @write and @fetch of __linearize() into a set of flags so that
additional flags can be added without needing more/new boolean parameters,
to precisely identify the access type.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c     | 21 +++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 936a397a08cd..3ddfbc99fa4f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static unsigned insn_alignment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned size)
 static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 				       struct segmented_address addr,
 				       unsigned *max_size, unsigned size,
-				       bool write, bool fetch,
-				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear)
+				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear,
+				       unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct desc_struct desc;
 	bool usable;
@@ -717,11 +717,11 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		if (!usable)
 			goto bad;
 		/* code segment in protected mode or read-only data segment */
-		if ((((ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) && (desc.type & 8))
-					|| !(desc.type & 2)) && write)
+		if ((((ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) && (desc.type & 8)) || !(desc.type & 2)) &&
+		    (flags & X86EMUL_F_WRITE))
 			goto bad;
 		/* unreadable code segment */
-		if (!fetch && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
+		if (!(flags & X86EMUL_F_FETCH) && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
 			goto bad;
 		lim = desc_limit_scaled(&desc);
 		if (!(desc.type & 8) && (desc.type & 4)) {
@@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ static int linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		     ulong *linear)
 {
 	unsigned max_size;
-	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, write, false,
-			   ctxt->mode, linear);
+	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, ctxt->mode, linear,
+			   write ? X86EMUL_F_WRITE : 0);
 }
 
 static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
 
 	if (ctxt->op_bytes != sizeof(unsigned long))
 		addr.ea = dst & ((1UL << (ctxt->op_bytes << 3)) - 1);
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, false, true, ctxt->mode, &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		ctxt->_eip = addr.ea;
 	return rc;
@@ -907,8 +908,8 @@ static int __do_insn_fetch_bytes(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int op_size)
 	 * boundary check itself.  Instead, we use max_size to check
 	 * against op_size.
 	 */
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, false, true, ctxt->mode,
-			 &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (unlikely(rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE))
 		return rc;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
index ab65f3a47dfd..86bbe997162d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ struct x86_instruction_info {
 #define X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED       5 /* IO is needed to complete emulation */
 #define X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED     6 /* Intercepted by nested VMCB/VMCS */
 
+/* x86-specific emulation flags */
+#define X86EMUL_F_WRITE			BIT(0)
+#define X86EMUL_F_FETCH			BIT(1)
+
 struct x86_emulate_ops {
 	void (*vm_bugged)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
 	/*
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 13:18 [PATCH v2 0/8] LASS KVM virtualization support Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: x86: Use a new flag for branch instructions Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: x86: Add an emulation flag for implicit system access Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: x86: Add X86EMUL_F_INVTLB and pass it in em_invlpg() Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: emulator: Add emulation of LASS violation checks on linear address Zeng Guang
2023-07-24  4:25   ` Chao Gao
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: VMX: Implement and apply vmx_is_lass_violation() for LASS protection Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LASS Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: Advertise LASS CPUID to user space Zeng Guang
2023-07-19  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] LASS KVM virtualization support Zeng Guang
2023-07-20  1:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-08-17  7:32   ` Zeng Guang
2023-08-17 18:18     ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-19  2:45 Zeng Guang
2023-07-19  2:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize() Zeng Guang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718131844.5706-2-guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox