From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:37:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725143857.228626-4-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725143857.228626-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Single-stepping a kernel-emulated instruction that generates an
interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
the respective interrupt handler.
The reason is that kvm_handle_sie_intercept(), after injecting the
interrupt, also processes the PER event and arranges a KVM_SINGLESTEP
exit. The interrupt is not yet delivered, however, so the userspace
sees the next instruction.
Fix by avoiding the KVM_SINGLESTEP exit when there is a pending
interrupt. The next __vcpu_run() loop iteration will arrange a
KVM_SINGLESTEP exit after delivering the interrupt.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index e54496740859..db222c749e5e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -583,6 +583,19 @@ static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return handle_instruction(vcpu);
}
+static bool should_handle_per_ifetch(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rc)
+{
+ /* Process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space. */
+ if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02))
+ return false;
+ if (rc != 0 && rc != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ return false;
+ if (guestdbg_sstep_enabled(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs)
+ /* __vcpu_run() will exit after delivering the interrupt. */
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -645,9 +658,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- /* process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space */
- if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02 &&
- (!rc || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP))
+ if (should_handle_per_ifetch(vcpu, rc))
per_rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(vcpu);
return per_rc ? per_rc : rc;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 14:37 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 15:04 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-25 14:37 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-08-02 22:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Sean Christopherson
2023-08-03 7:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725143857.228626-4-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox