From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725143857.228626-5-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725143857.228626-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Single-stepping a userspace-emulated instruction that generates an
interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
the respective interrupt handler.
The reason is that after arranging a KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit,
kvm_handle_sie_intercept() calls kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(),
which sets KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING. This bit, however, is not
processed immediately, but rather persists until the next ioctl(),
causing a spurious single-step exit.
Fix by clearing this bit in ioctl().
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 0c6333b108ba..e6511608280c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -5383,6 +5383,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = filp->private_data;
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
+ int rc;
switch (ioctl) {
case KVM_S390_IRQ: {
@@ -5390,7 +5391,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
if (copy_from_user(&s390irq, argp, sizeof(s390irq)))
return -EFAULT;
- return kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
+ rc = kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
+ break;
}
case KVM_S390_INTERRUPT: {
struct kvm_s390_interrupt s390int;
@@ -5400,10 +5402,25 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
return -EFAULT;
if (s390int_to_s390irq(&s390int, &s390irq))
return -EINVAL;
- return kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
+ rc = kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
+ break;
}
+ default:
+ rc = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+ break;
}
- return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+
+ /*
+ * To simplify single stepping of userspace-emulated instructions,
+ * KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit sets KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING (see
+ * should_handle_per_ifetch()). However, if userspace emulation injects
+ * an interrupt, it needs to be cleared, so that KVM_EXIT_DEBUG happens
+ * after (and not before) the interrupt delivery.
+ */
+ if (!rc)
+ vcpu->guest_debug &= ~KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING;
+
+ return rc;
}
static int kvm_s390_handle_pv_vcpu_dump(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 14:37 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 15:04 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-08-02 22:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Sean Christopherson
2023-08-03 7:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725143857.228626-5-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox