public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce a helper to set the guest's PMU
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:30:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230817003029.3073210-2-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817003029.3073210-1-rananta@google.com>

From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>

Introduce a new helper function to set the guest's PMU
(kvm->arch.arm_pmu), and use it when the guest's PMU needs
to be set. This helper will make it easier for the following
patches to modify the relevant code.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 5606509724787..0ffd1efa90c07 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -865,6 +865,32 @@ static bool pmu_irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static int kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
+
+	if (!arm_pmu) {
+		/*
+		 * No PMU set, get the default one.
+		 *
+		 * The observant among you will notice that the supported_cpus
+		 * mask does not get updated for the default PMU even though it
+		 * is quite possible the selected instance supports only a
+		 * subset of cores in the system. This is intentional, and
+		 * upholds the preexisting behavior on heterogeneous systems
+		 * where vCPUs can be scheduled on any core but the guest
+		 * counters could stop working.
+		 */
+		arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu();
+		if (!arm_pmu)
+			return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	kvm->arch.arm_pmu = arm_pmu;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pmu_id)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
@@ -884,9 +910,13 @@ static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pmu_id)
 				break;
 			}
 
-			kvm->arch.arm_pmu = arm_pmu;
+			ret = kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(kvm, arm_pmu);
+			if (ret) {
+				WARN_ON(ret);
+				break;
+			}
+
 			cpumask_copy(kvm->arch.supported_cpus, &arm_pmu->supported_cpus);
-			ret = 0;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -908,20 +938,10 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) {
-		/*
-		 * No PMU set, get the default one.
-		 *
-		 * The observant among you will notice that the supported_cpus
-		 * mask does not get updated for the default PMU even though it
-		 * is quite possible the selected instance supports only a
-		 * subset of cores in the system. This is intentional, and
-		 * upholds the preexisting behavior on heterogeneous systems
-		 * where vCPUs can be scheduled on any core but the guest
-		 * counters could stop working.
-		 */
-		kvm->arch.arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu();
-		if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu)
-			return -ENODEV;
+		int ret = kvm_arm_set_vm_pmu(kvm, NULL);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	switch (attr->attr) {
-- 
2.41.0.694.ge786442a9b-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-17  0:30 [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-09-15 19:22   ` [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce a helper to set the guest's PMU Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 17:24     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set the default PMU for the guest on vCPU reset Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  5:03   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-17  7:54   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-15 19:33   ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 16:41     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-18 16:47       ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 16:58         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Clear PM{C,I}NTEN{SET,CLR} and PMOVS{SET,CLR} " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Don't define the sysreg reset() for PM{USERENR,CCFILTR}_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify extracting PMCR_EL0.N Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  6:38   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-15 19:56   ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 16:53     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add a helper to read a vCPU's PMCR_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit PMCR_EL0.N for the guest Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-21 12:12   ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-21 23:28     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-22  3:26       ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-09-15 20:36         ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 17:02           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-22 10:05   ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-23 16:06     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-24  8:50       ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-08-25 22:34         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-26  2:40           ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-09-15 20:53   ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-15 21:54     ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 17:11       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-18 17:22         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-18 17:07     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] tools: Import arm_pmuv3.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-15 21:00   ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-18 17:20     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-08-17  0:30 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230817003029.3073210-2-rananta@google.com \
    --to=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox