From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920181731.2232453-3-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920181731.2232453-1-maz@kernel.org>
Since our emulated ITS advertises GITS_TYPER.PTA=0, the target
address associated to a collection is a PE number and not
an address. So far, so good. However, the PE number is what userspace
has provided given us (aka the vcpu_id), and not the internal vcpu
index.
Make sure we consistently retrieve the vcpu by ID rather than
by index, adding a helper that deals with most of the cases.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 5fe2365a629f..4aadcd24f6f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -378,6 +378,12 @@ static int update_affinity(struct vgic_irq *irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return ret;
}
+static struct kvm_vcpu *collection_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct its_collection *col)
+{
+ return kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, col->target_addr);
+}
+
/*
* Promotes the ITS view of affinity of an ITTE (which redistributor this LPI
* is targeting) to the VGIC's view, which deals with target VCPUs.
@@ -391,7 +397,7 @@ static void update_affinity_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
update_affinity(ite->irq, vcpu);
}
@@ -679,7 +685,7 @@ int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!ite || !its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection))
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, ite->collection);
if (!vcpu)
return E_ITS_INT_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
@@ -887,7 +893,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
return E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
ite->collection = collection;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
@@ -1121,7 +1127,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
}
if (its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
irq = vgic_add_lpi(kvm, lpi_nr, vcpu);
if (IS_ERR(irq)) {
@@ -1382,7 +1388,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (!its_is_collection_mapped(collection))
return E_ITS_INVALL_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
+ vcpu = collection_to_vcpu(kvm, collection);
vgic_its_invall(vcpu);
return 0;
@@ -1413,8 +1419,9 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (target1_addr == target2_addr)
return 0;
- vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target1_addr);
- vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, target2_addr);
+ /* We advertise GITS_TYPER.PTA==0, making the address the vcpu ID */
+ vcpu1 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target1_addr);
+ vcpu2 = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, target2_addr);
irq_count = vgic_copy_lpi_list(kvm, vcpu1, &intids);
if (irq_count < 0)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 18:17 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:11 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-09-21 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 13:12 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Refactor GICv3 SGI generation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:42 ` Joey Gouly
2023-09-21 11:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v2: Use cpuid from userspace as vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use vcpu_idx for the debug information Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu_idx for invalidation tracking Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:16 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-21 12:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: arm64: Simplify kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff() Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: arm64: Build MPIDR to vcpu index cache at runtime Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: arm64: Fast-track kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu() when mpidr_data is available Marc Zyngier
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Optimize affinity-based SGI injection Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 9:32 ` Zenghui Yu
2023-09-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: arm64: Clarify the ordering requirements for vcpu/RD creation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-21 2:11 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Oliver Upton
2023-09-21 9:39 ` Zenghui Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920181731.2232453-3-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox