From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: arm64: Make PMEVTYPER<n>_EL0.NSH RES0 if EL2 isn't advertised
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 18:56:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019185618.3442949-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019185618.3442949-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
The NSH bit, which filters event counting at EL2, is required by the
architecture if an implementation has EL2. Even though KVM doesn't
support nested virt yet, it makes no effort to hide the existence of EL2
from the ID registers. Userspace can, however, change the value of PFR0
to hide EL2. Align KVM's sysreg emulation with the architecture and make
NSH RES0 if EL2 isn't advertised. Keep in mind the bit is ignored when
constructing the backing perf event.
While at it, build the event type mask using explicit field definitions
instead of relying on ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK. KVM probably should've been
doing this in the first place, as it avoids changes to the
aforementioned mask affecting sysreg emulation.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++++--
include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 6b066e04dc5d..32d83db9674e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -60,6 +60,18 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
return __kvm_pmu_event_mask(pmuver);
}
+u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ u64 mask = ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 | ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0 |
+ kvm_pmu_event_mask(kvm);
+ u64 pfr0 = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
+
+ if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, pfr0))
+ mask |= ARMV8_PMU_INCLUDE_EL2;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
/**
* kvm_pmc_is_64bit - determine if counter is 64bit
* @pmc: counter context
@@ -657,18 +669,13 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
u64 select_idx)
{
struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_vcpu_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, select_idx);
- u64 reg, mask;
+ u64 reg;
if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
return;
- mask = ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
- mask &= ~ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT;
- mask |= kvm_pmu_event_mask(vcpu->kvm);
-
reg = counter_index_to_evtreg(pmc->idx);
-
- __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = data & mask;
+ __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = data & kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(vcpu->kvm);
kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(pmc);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index e92ec810d449..78720c373904 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -746,8 +746,12 @@ static u64 reset_pmevcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
static u64 reset_pmevtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
+ /* This thing will UNDEF, who cares about the reset value? */
+ if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
+ return 0;
+
reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
- __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
+ __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(vcpu->kvm);
return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
}
@@ -988,7 +992,7 @@ static bool access_pmu_evtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(vcpu, p->regval, idx);
kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
} else {
- p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
+ p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
}
return true;
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 31029f4f7be8..e0bcf447a2ab 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0(void);
})
u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
+u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm);
#else
struct kvm_pmu {
@@ -172,6 +173,10 @@ static inline u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void)
{
return 0;
}
+static inline u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0(void) {}
#endif
--
2.42.0.655.g421f12c284-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 18:56 [PATCH v3 0/2] KVM: arm64: PMU event filtering fixes Oliver Upton
2023-10-19 18:56 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-10-24 2:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: arm64: Make PMEVTYPER<n>_EL0.NSH RES0 if EL2 isn't advertised kernel test robot
2023-10-24 18:58 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-19 18:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: arm64: Add PMU event filter bits required if EL3 is implemented Oliver Upton
2023-10-24 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] KVM: arm64: PMU event filtering fixes Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231019185618.3442949-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox