From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/13] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE()
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:26:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231024002633.2540714-6-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024002633.2540714-1-seanjc@google.com>
Drop the "name" parameter from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(), it's unused and
the name is redundant with the macro, i.e. it's truly useless.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
index a01931f7d954..2d9771151dd9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature anti_feature;
};
-#define KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(name, __bit) \
+#define KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(__bit) \
({ \
struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature = { \
.anti_feature = KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(0xa, 0, EBX, __bit), \
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
feature; \
})
-#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, 5)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(5)
static inline unsigned int x86_family(unsigned int eax)
{
--
2.42.0.758.gaed0368e0e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 0:26 [PATCH v5 00/13] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't allow exposing unsupported architectural events Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't enumerate support for fixed counters KVM can't virtualize Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 19:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 21:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-25 3:17 ` JinrongLiang
2023-10-26 20:38 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-26 20:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-26 22:10 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-10-26 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 11:40 ` JinrongLiang
2023-10-24 14:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 0:26 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] KVM: selftests: Extend PMU counters test to permute on vPMU version Sean Christopherson
2023-10-24 11:49 ` JinrongLiang
2023-10-24 14:23 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231024002633.2540714-6-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox