public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>,
	seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dionnaglaze@google.com,
	pgonda@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/14] x86/tsc: Mark Secure TSC as reliable clocksource
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:38:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102123851.jsdolkfz7sd3jys7@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf92b26e-d940-4dc8-a339-56903952cee2@amd.com>

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:46:26PM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> On 11/2/2023 5:37 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> > On 11/2/2023 4:03 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 11:23:34AM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> >>> On 10/30/2023 10:48 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>>> On 10/29/23 23:36, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> >>>>> index 15f97c0abc9d..b0a8546d3703 100644
> >>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> >>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> >>>>> @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __init check_system_tsc_reliable(void)
> >>>>>  			tsc_clocksource_reliable = 1;
> >>>>>  	}
> >>>>>  #endif
> >>>>> -	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> >>>>> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE) || cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SECURE_TSC))
> >>>>>  		tsc_clocksource_reliable = 1;
> >>>>
> >>>> Why can't you just set X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE?
> >>>
> >>> Last time when I tried, I had removed my kvmclock changes and I had set
> >>> the X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE similar to Kirill's patch[1], this did not
> >>> select the SecureTSC.
> >>>
> >>> Let me try setting X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE and retaining my patch for
> >>> skipping kvmclock.
> >>
> >> kvmclock lowers its rating if TSC is good enough:
> >>
> >> 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
> >> 	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) &&
> >> 	    !check_tsc_unstable())
> >> 		kvm_clock.rating = 299;
> >>
> >> Does your TSC meet the requirements?
> > 
> > I have set TscInvariant (bit 8) in CPUID_8000_0007_edx and TSC is set as reliable.
> > 
> > With this I see kvm_clock rating being lowered, but kvm-clock is still being picked as clock-source.
> 
> Ah.. at later point TSC is picked up, is this expected ?
> 
> [    2.564052] clocksource: Switched to clocksource kvm-clock
> [    2.678136] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc

On bare metal I see switch from tsc-early to tsc. tsc-early rating is
equal to kvmclock rating after it gets lowered.

Maybe kvmclock rating has to be even lower after detecting sane TSC?

Sean, Paolo, any comments?

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-30  6:36 [PATCH v5 00/14] Add Secure TSC support for SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] virt: sev-guest: Use AES GCM crypto library Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 17:51   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  3:33     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] virt: sev-guest: Move mutex to SNP guest device structure Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] virt: sev-guest: Replace dev_dbg with pr_debug Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] virt: sev-guest: Add SNP guest request structure Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 18:16   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  4:01     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] virt: sev-guest: Add vmpck_id to snp_guest_dev struct Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 16:16   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-10-30 17:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  4:03       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30 18:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] x86/sev: Cache the secrets page address Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] x86/sev: Move and reorganize sev guest request api Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 19:16   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  4:28     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 14:17       ` Tom Lendacky
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] x86/mm: Add generic guest initialization hook Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 17:23   ` Dave Hansen
2023-11-02  4:30     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30 19:19   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  5:08     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] x86/sev: Add Secure TSC support for SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 16:46   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-11-02  5:13     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30 20:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  5:36     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  5:41     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 10:36       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-11-06 10:45         ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-06 13:00           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] x86/sev: Change TSC MSR behavior for Secure TSC enabled guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] x86/sev: Prevent RDTSC/RDTSCP interception " Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 20:32   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  5:47     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] x86/kvmclock: Skip kvmclock when Secure TSC is available Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 21:00   ` Tom Lendacky
2023-11-02  5:39     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] x86/tsc: Mark Secure TSC as reliable clocksource Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-10-30 17:18   ` Dave Hansen
2023-11-02  5:53     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 10:33       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-11-02 12:07         ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 12:16           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-02 12:38             ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2023-11-06 11:53               ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-11-06 13:03                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-10-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] x86/sev: Enable Secure TSC for SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231102123851.jsdolkfz7sd3jys7@box \
    --to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox