From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: s390: Minor refactor of base/ext facility lists
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 18:30:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231103173008.630217-5-nsg@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231103173008.630217-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Directly use the size of the arrays instead of going through the
indirection of kvm_s390_fac_size().
Don't use magic number for the number of entries in the non hypervisor
managed facility bit mask list.
Make the constraint of that number on kvm_s390_fac_base obvious.
Get rid of implicit double anding of stfle_fac_list.
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
I found it confusing before and think it's nicer this way but
it might be needless churn.
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index b3f17e014cab..e00ab2f38c89 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -217,33 +217,25 @@ static int async_destroy = 1;
module_param(async_destroy, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(async_destroy, "Asynchronous destroy for protected guests");
-/*
- * For now we handle at most 16 double words as this is what the s390 base
- * kernel handles and stores in the prefix page. If we ever need to go beyond
- * this, this requires changes to code, but the external uapi can stay.
- */
-#define SIZE_INTERNAL 16
-
+#define HMFAI_DWORDS 16
/*
* Base feature mask that defines default mask for facilities. Consists of the
* defines in FACILITIES_KVM and the non-hypervisor managed bits.
*/
-static unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_base[SIZE_INTERNAL] = { FACILITIES_KVM };
+static unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_base[HMFAI_DWORDS] = { FACILITIES_KVM };
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(((long[]){ FACILITIES_KVM })) <= HMFAI_DWORDS);
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_base) <= S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_base) <= S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64);
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_base) <= ARRAY_SIZE(stfle_fac_list));
+
/*
* Extended feature mask. Consists of the defines in FACILITIES_KVM_CPUMODEL
* and defines the facilities that can be enabled via a cpu model.
*/
-static unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_ext[SIZE_INTERNAL] = { FACILITIES_KVM_CPUMODEL };
-
-static unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_size(void)
-{
- BUILD_BUG_ON(SIZE_INTERNAL > S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(SIZE_INTERNAL > S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(SIZE_INTERNAL * sizeof(unsigned long) >
- sizeof(stfle_fac_list));
-
- return SIZE_INTERNAL;
-}
+static const unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_ext[] = { FACILITIES_KVM_CPUMODEL };
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_ext) <= S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64);
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_ext) <= S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64);
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_ext) <= ARRAY_SIZE(stfle_fac_list));
/* available cpu features supported by kvm */
static DECLARE_BITMAP(kvm_s390_available_cpu_feat, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
@@ -3341,13 +3333,16 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.sie_page2->kvm = kvm;
kvm->arch.model.fac_list = kvm->arch.sie_page2->fac_list;
- for (i = 0; i < kvm_s390_fac_size(); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_base); i++) {
kvm->arch.model.fac_mask[i] = stfle_fac_list[i] &
- (kvm_s390_fac_base[i] |
- kvm_s390_fac_ext[i]);
+ kvm_s390_fac_base[i];
kvm->arch.model.fac_list[i] = stfle_fac_list[i] &
kvm_s390_fac_base[i];
}
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_s390_fac_ext); i++) {
+ kvm->arch.model.fac_mask[i] |= stfle_fac_list[i] &
+ kvm_s390_fac_ext[i];
+ }
kvm->arch.model.subfuncs = kvm_s390_available_subfunc;
/* we are always in czam mode - even on pre z14 machines */
@@ -5859,9 +5854,8 @@ static int __init kvm_s390_init(void)
return -EINVAL;
}
- for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
- kvm_s390_fac_base[i] |=
- stfle_fac_list[i] & nonhyp_mask(i);
+ for (i = 0; i < HMFAI_DWORDS; i++)
+ kvm_s390_fac_base[i] |= nonhyp_mask(i);
r = __kvm_s390_init();
if (r)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 17:30 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: s390: Fix minor bugs in STFLE shadowing Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-03 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix STFLE interpretive execution identification Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-03 18:12 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-11-03 18:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-03 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix length of facility list shadowed Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-03 18:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-06 13:06 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-06 13:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2023-11-03 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: s390: cpu model: Use previously unused constant Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-03 18:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-03 18:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-06 11:00 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-03 17:30 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-11-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: s390: Minor refactor of base/ext facility lists Claudio Imbrenda
2023-11-06 11:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-11-06 12:18 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231103173008.630217-5-nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox