From: Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: oliver.upton@linux.dev, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com, jthoughton@google.com,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/14] KVM: selftests: Use EPOLL in userfaultfd_util reader threads and signal errors via TEST_ASSERT
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 21:03:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231109210325.3806151-13-amoorthy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231109210325.3806151-1-amoorthy@google.com>
With multiple reader threads POLLing a single UFFD, the test suffers
from the thundering herd problem: performance degrades as the number of
reader threads is increased. Solve this issue [1] by switching the
the polling mechanism to EPOLL + EPOLLEXCLUSIVE.
Also, change the error-handling convention of uffd_handler_thread_fn.
Instead of just printing errors and returning early from the polling
loop, check for them via TEST_ASSERT. "return NULL" is reserved for a
successful exit from uffd_handler_thread_fn, ie one triggered by a
write to the exit pipe.
Performance samples generated by the command in [2] are given below.
Num Reader Threads, Paging Rate (POLL), Paging Rate (EPOLL)
1 249k 185k
2 201k 235k
4 186k 155k
16 150k 217k
32 89k 198k
[1] Single-vCPU performance does suffer somewhat.
[2] ./demand_paging_test -u MINOR -s shmem -v 4 -o -r <num readers>
Signed-off-by: Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c | 1 -
.../selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c | 74 +++++++++----------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
index f7897a951f90..0455347f932a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
-#include <poll.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
index 6f220aa4fb08..2a179133645a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <poll.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
+#include <sys/epoll.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include "kvm_util.h"
@@ -32,60 +33,55 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
int64_t pages = 0;
struct timespec start;
struct timespec ts_diff;
+ int epollfd;
+ struct epoll_event evt;
+
+ epollfd = epoll_create(1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(epollfd >= 0, "Failed to create epollfd.");
+
+ evt.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLEXCLUSIVE;
+ evt.data.u32 = 0;
+ TEST_ASSERT(epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, uffd, &evt) == 0,
+ "Failed to add uffd to epollfd");
+
+ evt.events = EPOLLIN;
+ evt.data.u32 = 1;
+ TEST_ASSERT(epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, reader_args->pipe, &evt) == 0,
+ "Failed to add pipe to epollfd");
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
while (1) {
struct uffd_msg msg;
- struct pollfd pollfd[2];
- char tmp_chr;
int r;
- pollfd[0].fd = uffd;
- pollfd[0].events = POLLIN;
- pollfd[1].fd = reader_args->pipe;
- pollfd[1].events = POLLIN;
-
- r = poll(pollfd, 2, -1);
- switch (r) {
- case -1:
- pr_info("poll err");
- continue;
- case 0:
- continue;
- case 1:
- break;
- default:
- pr_info("Polling uffd returned %d", r);
- return NULL;
- }
+ r = epoll_wait(epollfd, &evt, 1, -1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
+ "Unexpected number of events (%d) from epoll, errno = %d",
+ r, errno);
- if (pollfd[0].revents & POLLERR) {
- pr_info("uffd revents has POLLERR");
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (evt.data.u32 == 1) {
+ char tmp_chr;
- if (pollfd[1].revents & POLLIN) {
- r = read(pollfd[1].fd, &tmp_chr, 1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!(evt.events & (EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP)),
+ "Reader thread received EPOLLERR or EPOLLHUP on pipe.");
+ r = read(reader_args->pipe, &tmp_chr, 1);
TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
- "Error reading pipefd in UFFD thread\n");
+ "Error reading pipefd in uffd reader thread");
break;
}
- if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN))
- continue;
+ TEST_ASSERT(!(evt.events & (EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP)),
+ "Reader thread received EPOLLERR or EPOLLHUP on uffd.");
r = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg));
if (r == -1) {
- if (errno == EAGAIN)
- continue;
- pr_info("Read of uffd got errno %d\n", errno);
- return NULL;
+ TEST_ASSERT(errno == EAGAIN,
+ "Error reading from UFFD: errno = %d", errno);
+ continue;
}
- if (r != sizeof(msg)) {
- pr_info("Read on uffd returned unexpected size: %d bytes", r);
- return NULL;
- }
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == sizeof(msg),
+ "Read on uffd returned unexpected number of bytes (%d)", r);
if (!(msg.event & UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT))
continue;
@@ -93,8 +89,8 @@ static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
if (reader_args->delay)
usleep(reader_args->delay);
r = reader_args->handler(reader_args->uffd_mode, uffd, &msg);
- if (r < 0)
- return NULL;
+ TEST_ASSERT(r >= 0,
+ "Reader thread handler fn returned negative value %d", r);
pages++;
}
--
2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-09 21:03 [PATCH v6 00/14] Improve KVM + userfaultfd performance via KVM_MEMORY_FAULT_EXITs on stage-2 faults Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] KVM: Documentation: Clarify meaning of hva_to_pfn()'s 'atomic' parameter Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-07 18:44 ` Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] KVM: Documentation: Add docstrings for __kvm_read/write_guest_page() Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] KVM: Simplify error handling in __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-07 18:57 ` Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] KVM: Try using fast GUP to resolve read faults Anish Moorthy
2024-02-05 21:55 ` Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] KVM: Add memslot flag to let userspace force an exit on missing hva mappings Anish Moorthy
2024-01-31 0:25 ` James Houghton
2024-01-31 21:59 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-01 0:26 ` James Houghton
2024-02-01 1:19 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-01 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-01 19:24 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-02 1:03 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-02 1:01 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-01 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-01 19:53 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] KVM: x86: Enable KVM_CAP_EXIT_ON_MISSING and annotate EFAULTs from stage-2 fault handler Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] KVM: arm64: Enable KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:07 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-07 16:41 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-07 21:21 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 21:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-07 22:07 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-09 1:13 ` Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] KVM: arm64: Enable KVM_CAP_EXIT_ON_MISSING and annotate an EFAULT from stage-2 fault-handler Anish Moorthy
2024-01-30 23:58 ` James Houghton
2024-01-31 22:38 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-02-09 1:21 ` Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] KVM: selftests: Report per-vcpu demand paging rate from demand paging test Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] KVM: selftests: Allow many vCPUs and reader threads per UFFD in " Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` Anish Moorthy [this message]
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] KVM: selftests: Add memslot_flags parameter to memstress_create_vm() Anish Moorthy
2023-11-09 21:03 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] KVM: selftests: Handle memory fault exits in demand_paging_test Anish Moorthy
2024-02-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v6 00/14] Improve KVM + userfaultfd performance via KVM_MEMORY_FAULT_EXITs on stage-2 faults Sean Christopherson
2024-02-09 16:00 ` Anish Moorthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231109210325.3806151-13-amoorthy@google.com \
--to=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).