From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
ankita@nvidia.com,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, gshan@redhat.com, aniketa@nvidia.com,
cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com,
vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:16:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206151603.GR2692119@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXBlmt88dKmZLCU9@arm.com>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:14:18PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> We could do with a pgprot_maybewritecombine() or
> pgprot_writecombinenospec() (similar to Jason's idea but without
> changing the semantics of pgprot_device()). For the user mapping on
> arm64 this would be Device (even _GRE) since it can't disable
> speculation but stage 2 would leave the decision to the guest since the
> speculative loads aren't much different from committed loads done
> wrongly.
This would be fine, as would a VMA flag. Please pick one :)
I think a VMA flag is simpler than messing with pgprot.
> If we want the VMM to drive this entirely, we could add a new mmap()
> flag like MAP_WRITECOMBINE or PROT_WRITECOMBINE. They do feel a bit
As in the other thread, we cannot unconditionally map NORMAL_NC into
the VMM.
> The latter has some benefits for DPDK but it's a lot more involved
> with
DPDK WC support will be solved with some VFIO-only change if anyone
ever cares to make it, if that is what you mean.
> having to add device-specific knowledge into the VMM. The VMM would also
> have to present the whole BAR contiguously to the guest even if there
> are different mapping attributes within the range. So a lot of MAP_FIXED
> uses. I'd rather leaving this decision with the guest than the VMM, it
> looks like more hassle to create those mappings. The VMM or the VFIO
> could only state write-combine and speculation allowed.
We talked about this already, the guest must decide, the VMM doesn't
have the information to pre-predict which pages the guest will want to
use WC on.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 3:30 [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory ankita
2023-12-05 9:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 11:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-05 13:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 14:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-05 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 16:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-05 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-05 16:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-05 17:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-05 17:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 18:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 11:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-06 12:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 15:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-12-06 16:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-06 18:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 19:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-06 19:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-07 2:53 ` Ankit Agrawal
2023-12-06 11:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-05 19:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-05 19:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-06 14:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-06 15:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-06 15:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-06 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-12-06 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-07 10:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-07 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-07 14:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-05 13:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-12-05 14:16 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-12-06 8:17 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-12-05 11:48 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206151603.GR2692119@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox