public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhang Xiong <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 10/11] x86: pmu: Add IBPB indirect jump asm blob
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2024 11:14:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103031409.2504051-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103031409.2504051-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Currently the lower boundary of branch misses event is set to 0.
Strictly speaking 0 shouldn't be a valid count since it can't tell us if
branch misses event counter works correctly or even disabled. Whereas
it's also possible and reasonable that branch misses event count is 0
especailly for such simple loop() program with advanced branch
predictor.

To eliminate such ambiguity and make branch misses event verification
more acccurately, an extra IBPB indirect jump asm blob is appended and
IBPB command is leveraged to clear the branch target buffer and force to
cause a branch miss for the indirect jump.

Suggested-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 x86/pmu.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 8fd3db0fbf81..c8d4a0dcd362 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -27,14 +27,26 @@
 	"nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop;\n\t"	\
 	"loop 1b;\n\t"
 
-/*Enable GLOBAL_CTRL + disable GLOBAL_CTRL + clflush/mfence instructions */
-#define PRECISE_EXTRA_INSTRNS  (2 + 4 + 2)
+#define IBPB_JMP_INSTRNS      7
+#define IBPB_JMP_BRANCHES     1
+#define IBPB_JMP_ASM(_wrmsr)				\
+	"mov $1, %%eax; xor %%edx, %%edx;\n\t"		\
+	"mov $73, %%ecx;\n\t"				\
+	_wrmsr "\n\t"					\
+	"lea 2f, %%rax;\n\t"				\
+	"jmp *%%rax;\n\t"				\
+	"nop;\n\t"					\
+	"2: nop;\n\t"
+
+/* GLOBAL_CTRL enable + disable + clflush/mfence + IBPB_JMP */
+#define PRECISE_EXTRA_INSTRNS  (2 + 4 + 2 + IBPB_JMP_INSTRNS)
 #define PRECISE_LOOP_INSTRNS   (N * LOOP_INSTRNS + PRECISE_EXTRA_INSTRNS)
-#define PRECISE_LOOP_BRANCHES  (N)
-#define PRECISE_LOOP_ASM(_clflush)					\
+#define PRECISE_LOOP_BRANCHES  (N + IBPB_JMP_BRANCHES)
+#define PRECISE_LOOP_ASM(_clflush, _wrmsr)				\
 	"wrmsr;\n\t"							\
 	"mov %%ecx, %%edi; mov %%ebx, %%ecx;\n\t"			\
 	LOOP_ASM(_clflush)						\
+	IBPB_JMP_ASM(_wrmsr)						\
 	"mov %%edi, %%ecx; xor %%eax, %%eax; xor %%edx, %%edx;\n\t"	\
 	"wrmsr;\n\t"
 
@@ -74,30 +86,42 @@ char *buf;
 static struct pmu_event *gp_events;
 static unsigned int gp_events_size;
 
-#define _loop_asm(_clflush)					\
+#define _loop_asm(_clflush, _wrmsr)				\
 do {								\
 	asm volatile(LOOP_ASM(_clflush)				\
+		     IBPB_JMP_ASM(_wrmsr)			\
 		     : "=c"(tmp), "=r"(tmp2), "=r"(tmp3)	\
-		     : "0"(N), "1"(buf));			\
+		     : "0"(N), "1"(buf)				\
+		     : "eax", "edx");				\
 } while (0)
 
-#define _precise_loop_asm(_clflush)				\
+#define _precise_loop_asm(_clflush, _wrmsr)			\
 do {								\
-	asm volatile(PRECISE_LOOP_ASM(_clflush)			\
+	asm volatile(PRECISE_LOOP_ASM(_clflush, _wrmsr)		\
 		     : "=b"(tmp), "=r"(tmp2), "=r"(tmp3)	\
 		     : "a"(eax), "d"(edx), "c"(global_ctl),	\
 		       "0"(N), "1"(buf)				\
 		     : "edi");					\
 } while (0)
 
+static int has_ibpb(void)
+{
+	return this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
+	       this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB);
+}
+
 static inline void __loop(void)
 {
 	unsigned long tmp, tmp2, tmp3;
 
-	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
-		_loop_asm("clflush (%1)");
+	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH) && has_ibpb())
+		_loop_asm("clflush (%1)", "wrmsr");
+	else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
+		_loop_asm("clflush (%1)", "nop");
+	else if (has_ibpb())
+		_loop_asm("nop", "wrmsr");
 	else
-		_loop_asm("nop");
+		_loop_asm("nop", "nop");
 }
 
 /*
@@ -114,10 +138,14 @@ static inline void __precise_count_loop(u64 cntrs)
 	u32 eax = cntrs & (BIT_ULL(32) - 1);
 	u32 edx = cntrs >> 32;
 
-	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
-		_precise_loop_asm("clflush (%1)");
+	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH) && has_ibpb())
+		_precise_loop_asm("clflush (%1)", "wrmsr");
+	else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
+		_precise_loop_asm("clflush (%1)", "nop");
+	else if (has_ibpb())
+		_precise_loop_asm("nop", "wrmsr");
 	else
-		_precise_loop_asm("nop");
+		_precise_loop_asm("nop", "nop");
 }
 
 static inline void loop(u64 cntrs)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-03  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-03  3:13 [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 00/11] pmu test bugs fix and improvements Dapeng Mi
2024-01-03  3:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 01/11] x86: pmu: Remove duplicate code in pmu_init() Dapeng Mi
2024-03-28  1:19   ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-03-28  1:21     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 02/11] x86: pmu: Enlarge cnt[] length to 64 in check_counters_many() Dapeng Mi
2024-03-25 21:41   ` Jim Mattson
2024-03-27  6:40     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 03/11] x86: pmu: Add asserts to warn inconsistent fixed events and counters Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  5:30   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-27  6:43     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-27 13:11   ` Jim Mattson
2024-03-28  9:29     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 04/11] x86: pmu: Switch instructions and core cycles events sequence Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  5:36   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-27  8:54     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-27 17:06       ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-28 10:09         ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 05/11] x86: pmu: Refine fixed_events[] names Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  5:38   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 06/11] x86: pmu: Remove blank line and redundant space Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  5:38   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-28  1:23   ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-03-28 10:12     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 07/11] x86: pmu: Enable and disable PMCs in loop() asm blob Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  6:07   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-27  8:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-04-08 23:17       ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-04-09  0:28         ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 08/11] x86: pmu: Improve instruction and branches events verification Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  6:14   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-27  8:59     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 09/11] x86: pmu: Improve LLC misses event verification Dapeng Mi
2024-03-27  6:23   ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-27  9:18     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-27 15:20   ` Yang, Weijiang
2024-01-03  3:14 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2024-01-03  3:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 11/11] x86: pmu: Improve branch " Dapeng Mi
2024-01-24  8:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch v3 00/11] pmu test bugs fix and improvements Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240103031409.2504051-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox