public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	 Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 17/29] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters
Date: Tue,  9 Jan 2024 15:02:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240109230250.424295-18-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109230250.424295-1-seanjc@google.com>

From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>

Extend the PMU counters test to validate architectural events using fixed
counters.  The core logic is largely the same, the biggest difference
being that if a fixed counter exists, its associated event is available
(the SDM doesn't explicitly state this to be true, but it's KVM's ABI and
letting software program a fixed counter that doesn't actually count would
be quite bizarre).

Note, fixed counters rely on PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL.

Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c  | 54 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
index 5b8687bb4639..663e8fbe7ff8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -150,26 +150,46 @@ static void __guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx, struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature even
 	guest_assert_event_count(idx, event, pmc, pmc_msr);
 }
 
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL						\
+({									\
+	struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature = {};			\
+									\
+	feature;							\
+})
+
+static bool pmu_is_null_feature(struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature event)
+{
+	return !(*(u64 *)&event);
+}
+
 static void guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx)
 {
 	const struct {
 		struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event;
+		struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature fixed_event;
 	} intel_event_to_feature[] = {
-		[INTEL_ARCH_CPU_CYCLES_INDEX]		 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_REFERENCE_CYCLES_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_LLC_REFERENCES_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_REFERENCES },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_LLC_MISSES_INDEX]		 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_MISSES },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED },
-		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_CPU_CYCLES_INDEX]		 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES_FIXED },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED_FIXED },
+		/*
+		 * Note, the fixed counter for reference cycles is NOT the same
+		 * as the general purpose architectural event.  The fixed counter
+		 * explicitly counts at the same frequency as the TSC, whereas
+		 * the GP event counts at a fixed, but uarch specific, frequency.
+		 * Bundle them here for simplicity.
+		 */
+		[INTEL_ARCH_REFERENCE_CYCLES_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_TSC_CYCLES_FIXED },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_LLC_REFERENCES_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_REFERENCES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_LLC_MISSES_INDEX]		 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_MISSES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS, X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_FIXED },
 	};
 
 	uint32_t nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
 	uint32_t pmu_version = guest_get_pmu_version();
 	/* PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL exists only for Architectural PMU Version 2+. */
 	bool guest_has_perf_global_ctrl = pmu_version >= 2;
-	struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event;
+	struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event, fixed_event;
 	uint32_t base_pmc_msr;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -199,6 +219,22 @@ static void guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx)
 		__guest_test_arch_event(idx, gp_event, i, base_pmc_msr + i,
 					MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + i, eventsel);
 	}
+
+	if (!guest_has_perf_global_ctrl)
+		return;
+
+	fixed_event = intel_event_to_feature[idx].fixed_event;
+	if (pmu_is_null_feature(fixed_event) || !this_pmu_has(fixed_event))
+		return;
+
+	i = fixed_event.f.bit;
+
+	wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, FIXED_PMC_CTRL(i, FIXED_PMC_KERNEL));
+
+	__guest_test_arch_event(idx, fixed_event, i | INTEL_RDPMC_FIXED,
+				MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i,
+				MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
+				FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(i));
 }
 
 static void guest_test_arch_events(void)
-- 
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-09 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 23:02 [PATCH v10 00/29] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 01/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 02/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 03/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 04/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 05/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Get eventsel for fixed counters from perf Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 06/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't ignore bits 31:30 for RDPMC index on AMD Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 07/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Prioritize VMX interception over #GP on RDPMC due to bad index Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 08/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Apply "fast" RDPMC only to Intel PMUs Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 09/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Disallow "fast" RDPMC for architectural " Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 10/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Treat "fixed" PMU type in RDPMC as index as a value, not flag Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 11/29] KVM: x86/pmu: Explicitly check for RDPMC of unsupported Intel PMC types Sean Christopherson
2024-01-12  3:50   ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 12/29] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 13/29] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 14/29] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 15/29] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2024-01-10  9:21   ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-10 13:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 16/29] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2024-01-12  9:14   ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-12 21:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-15  2:03       ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-30 23:27         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-31  2:11           ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-31 15:31             ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-01  1:51               ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-09 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 18/29] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of " Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 19/29] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 20/29] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 21/29] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 23/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 24/29] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 25/29] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 26/29] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 27/29] KVM: selftests: Add a forced emulation variation of KVM_ASM_SAFE() Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 28/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers for safe and safe+forced RDMSR, RDPMC, and XGETBV Sean Christopherson
2024-01-09 23:02 ` [PATCH v10 29/29] KVM: selftests: Extend PMU counters test to validate RDPMC after WRMSR Sean Christopherson
2024-01-12  9:17 ` [PATCH v10 00/29] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Mi, Dapeng
2024-01-31  0:59 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240109230250.424295-18-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox