From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA32381C6 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705860617; cv=none; b=BrM94zjKeNs+18XNBFj20UdJptY5R04Y5GdbNki4eHN9UqqVh/fXWA+mnL7uNlxuHADNrH3vNJK11UdYXUCaYnQcXkYtDRSHVB3aM5hFWkFxzZ9q/OiZxyNhEw+si2TQFmh4mZeE3lSmx5ssrSsHpdtdT05EVQtbNnsDgCp5oiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705860617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rl/v6qrmQdewiBGrXL8EVM0U481qtb9GIY3m4jYIpvs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SVLVD4ACyGcIyFqrrxg6OWPl2tsFcJzLafNgr9BppwwLXUyeHBshojZL8ykI2Tho2+Tc4XP9hcP2fBNir2NcEGW1mshKqfTedyPUrOyXHDuPG0UTumw+VXSR+cXRaj4omvIPSxF6SWc7EgLexX/BlBYLyDK/YA6m6gH/V4DpVUQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eYRRY3l+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eYRRY3l+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F66EC433C7; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:10:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705860616; bh=Rl/v6qrmQdewiBGrXL8EVM0U481qtb9GIY3m4jYIpvs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eYRRY3l+M5kL8+syomvwfSBrYc0/NFWHYsdbeeexl4QKwdhXJYuMvxqJHS2C9Aj5B h6LFLrgwMfAKoVC46zmLDDQGH+VM2iry/k2POnqayiCO3qobdjpQaVchjYSPltew8c dkagHSdXmj1KpztNCW1kfS5zNNoUMnZYn+9Frtr63CLD/xLdBgYpb8nkEyxyrPWIxP SH+YFbAryQ1dI/qWfP91ZQ5RtAO3DxmzIgIhccmr1gvwv4dEBgWWZVhNFLUid1BiA6 511sj5khDRML/QDN3GvvMglR+kAt4BQtOsqU+YZyQXJH9j0OEXNJ6oA9P/EJGHveai +kGNLGzkyl4OA== Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:10:09 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Andy Chiu Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Nelson Chu , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, anup@brainfault.org, atishp@atishpatra.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta , greentime.hu@sifive.com, guoren@linux.alibaba.com, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v21 23/27] riscv: detect assembler support for .option arch Message-ID: <20240121181009.GA1469@sol.localdomain> References: <20240121011341.GA97368@sol.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:32:59PM +0800, Andy Chiu wrote: > > Maybe what we really should do is to upgrade the condition check to a > one liner shell script and grep if "Warning" is being printed. Sadly > this warning is not failing the compilation with -Werror. > > I can try forming a patch on this if it feels alright to people. What about -Wa,--fatal-warnings ? - Eric