Re: [PATCH v12 13/16] iommu: Improve iopf_queue_remove_device()

Baolu Lu
2024-02-08T01:32:14Z

On 2024/2/8 1:59, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> Hi Baolu,
>
> On 2/7/2024 5:59 PM, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 2024/2/7 10:50, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 9:33 AM
>>>>
>>>> Convert iopf_queue_remove_device() to return void instead of an error code,
>>>> as the return value is never used. This removal helper is designed to be
>>>> never-failed, so there's no need for error handling.
>>>>
>>>> Ack all outstanding page requests from the device with the response code of
>>>> IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID, indicating device should not attempt any retry.
>>>>
>>>> Add comments to this helper explaining the steps involved in removing a
>>>> device from the iopf queue and disabling its PRI. The individual drivers
>>>> are expected to be adjusted accordingly. Here we just define the expected
>>>> behaviors of the individual iommu driver from the core's perspective.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Yan Zhao<yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@intel.com>, with one nit:
>>>
>>>> + * Removing a device from an iopf_queue. It's recommended to follow
>>>> these
>>>> + * steps when removing a device:
>>>>    *
>>>> - * Return: 0 on success and <0 on error.
>>>> + * - Disable new PRI reception: Turn off PRI generation in the IOMMU
>>>> hardware
>>>> + *   and flush any hardware page request queues. This should be done
>>>> before
>>>> + *   calling into this helper.
>>>> + * - Acknowledge all outstanding PRQs to the device: Respond to all
>>>> outstanding
>>>> + *   page requests with IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID, indicating the device
>>>> should
>>>> + *   not retry. This helper function handles this.
>>> this implies calling iopf_queue_remove_device() here.
>>>
>>>> + * - Disable PRI on the device: After calling this helper, the caller could
>>>> + *   then disable PRI on the device.
>>>> + * - Call iopf_queue_remove_device(): Calling iopf_queue_remove_device()
>>>> + *   essentially disassociates the device. The fault_param might still exist,
>>>> + *   but iommu_page_response() will do nothing. The device fault parameter
>>>> + *   reference count has been properly passed from
>>>> iommu_report_device_fault()
>>>> + *   to the fault handling work, and will eventually be released after
>>>> + *   iommu_page_response().
>>>>    */
>>> but here it suggests calling iopf_queue_remove_device() again. If the comment
>>> is just about to detail the behavior with that invocation shouldn't it be merged
>>> with the previous one instead of pretending to be the final step for driver
>>> to call?
>>
>> Above just explains the behavior of calling iopf_queue_remove_device().
>
> Can you please leave a line -OR- move this to previous para? Otherwise we will
> get confused.

Sure. I will make it look like below.

/**
* iopf_queue_remove_device - Remove producer from fault queue
* @queue: IOPF queue
* @dev: device to remove
*
* Removing a device from an iopf_queue. It's recommended to follow these
* steps when removing a device:
*
* - Disable new PRI reception: Turn off PRI generation in the IOMMU
hardware
* and flush any hardware page request queues. This should be done before
* calling into this helper.
* - Acknowledge all outstanding PRQs to the device: Respond to all
outstanding
* page requests with IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID, indicating the device
should
* not retry. This helper function handles this.
* - Disable PRI on the device: After calling this helper, the caller could
* then disable PRI on the device.
*
* Calling iopf_queue_remove_device() essentially disassociates the device.
* The fault_param might still exist, but iommu_page_response() will do
* nothing. The device fault parameter reference count has been properly
* passed from iommu_report_device_fault() to the fault handling work, and
* will eventually be released after iommu_page_response().
*/

Best regards,
baolu