From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix AR parameter in MEM_OP ioctl
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:45:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209204539.4150550-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi Christian, Janosch, Heiko,
Here is a pair of patches to replace the RFC I recently sent [1].
Patch 1 performs the host/guest access register swap that Christian
suggested (instead of a full sync_reg/store_reg process).
Patch 2 provides a selftest patch that exercises this scenario.
Applying patch 2 without patch 1 fails in the following way:
[eric@host linux]# ./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop
TAP version 13
1..16
ok 1 simple copy
ok 2 generic error checks
ok 3 copy with storage keys
ok 4 cmpxchg with storage keys
ok 5 concurrently cmpxchg with storage keys
ok 6 copy with key storage protection override
ok 7 copy with key fetch protection
ok 8 copy with key fetch protection override
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
s390x/memop.c:186: !r
pid=5720 tid=5720 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
1 0x00000000010042af: memop_ioctl at memop.c:186 (discriminator 3)
2 0x0000000001006697: test_copy_access_register at memop.c:400 (discriminator 2)
3 0x0000000001002aaf: main at memop.c:1181
4 0x000003ffaec33a5b: ?? ??:0
5 0x000003ffaec33b5d: ?? ??:0
6 0x0000000001002ba9: _start at ??:?
KVM_S390_MEM_OP failed, rc: 40 errno: 4 (Interrupted system call)
Thoughts on this approach?
Thanks,
Eric
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131205832.2179029-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
Eric Farman (2):
KVM: s390: load guest access registers in MEM_OP ioctl
KVM: s390: selftests: memop: add a simple AR test
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 6 +++++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 20:45 Eric Farman [this message]
2024-02-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: s390: load guest access registers in MEM_OP ioctl Eric Farman
2024-02-12 10:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-02-12 11:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-02-13 17:31 ` Eric Farman
2024-02-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: s390: selftests: memop: add a simple AR test Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240209204539.4150550-1-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox