From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
shahuang@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/18] arm64: efi: Improve device tree discovery
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:35:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304-da434501d4e2e0685e6a954e@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df9c5b95-0cc4-4d82-b8d9-603dc069f7de@arm.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:34:44AM +0000, Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
> On 27/02/2024 19:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Zero is a valid address for the device tree so add an fdt_valid data
> > member to determine when the address is valid or not. Also, check the
> > device tree GUID when the environment variable is missing. The latter
> > change allows directly loading the unit test with QEMU's '-kernel'
> > command line parameter, which is much faster than putting the test
> > in the EFI file system and then running it from the UEFI shell.
> >
>
> Out of curiosity, the fdt pointer can be zero just in KUT or zero is an
> address that efi_load_image or efi_get_system_config_table could return?
> Similar code in Linux treats 0 an non valid address https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c#L370
Actually, on second thought, it can't be zero. I momentarily forgot that
when we get the fdt pointer from EFI it'll be a virtual address (unlike
when we get it from x0). For v2, I'll drop the fdt_valid since fdt==NULL
is sufficient.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
>
> In any case, this won't hurt:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 19:21 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 01/18] runtime: Update MAX_SMP probe Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:43 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 02/18] runtime: Add yet another 'no kernel' error message Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:50 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/18] arm64: efi: Don't create dummy test Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:57 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 04/18] arm64: efi: Make running tests on EFI can be parallel Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 22:06 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 05/18] arm64: efi: Remove redundant dtb generation Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:16 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 06/18] arm64: efi: Move run code into a function Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:19 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 07/18] arm64: efi: Remove EFI_USE_DTB Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:20 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/18] arm64: efi: Improve device tree discovery Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:34 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-04 9:35 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/18] lib/efi: Add support for loading the initrd Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:44 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 10/18] arm64: efi: Allow running tests directly Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:52 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-04 9:43 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 11/18] arm/arm64: Factor out some initial setup Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:59 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 12/18] arm/arm64: Factor out allocator init from mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:01 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 13/18] arm64: Simplify efi_mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:10 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 10:01 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 14/18] arm64: Add memregions_efi_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:16 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 15/18] arm64: efi: Don't map reserved regions Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:18 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 16/18] arm64: efi: Fix _start returns from failed _relocate Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:58 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 17/18] arm64: efi: Switch to our own stack Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 9:03 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 18/18] arm64: efi: Add gitlab CI Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 9:06 ` Nikos Nikoleris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240304-da434501d4e2e0685e6a954e@orel \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox