From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: alexandru.elisei@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nikos.nikoleris@arm.com, shahuang@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/18] arm/arm64: Factor out allocator init from mem_init
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305164623.379149-32-andrew.jones@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305164623.379149-20-andrew.jones@linux.dev>
The allocator init is identical for mem_init() and efi_mem_init().
Share it.
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
---
lib/arm/setup.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
index 80f952377cf9..7f2043907634 100644
--- a/lib/arm/setup.c
+++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
@@ -136,9 +136,28 @@ static void arm_memregions_add_assumed(void)
#endif
}
-static void mem_init(phys_addr_t freemem_start)
+static void mem_allocator_init(phys_addr_t freemem_start, phys_addr_t freemem_end)
{
phys_addr_t base, top;
+
+ freemem_start = PAGE_ALIGN(freemem_start);
+ freemem_end &= PAGE_MASK;
+
+ phys_alloc_init(freemem_start, freemem_end - freemem_start);
+ phys_alloc_set_minimum_alignment(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+
+ phys_alloc_get_unused(&base, &top);
+ base = PAGE_ALIGN(base);
+ top &= PAGE_MASK;
+ assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || !(base >> 32));
+ if (sizeof(long) != 8 && (top >> 32) != 0)
+ top = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
+ page_alloc_init_area(0, base >> PAGE_SHIFT, top >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ page_alloc_ops_enable();
+}
+
+static void mem_init(phys_addr_t freemem_start)
+{
struct mem_region *freemem, *r, mem = {
.start = (phys_addr_t)-1,
};
@@ -169,17 +188,7 @@ static void mem_init(phys_addr_t freemem_start)
__phys_offset = mem.start; /* PHYS_OFFSET */
__phys_end = mem.end; /* PHYS_END */
- phys_alloc_init(freemem_start, freemem->end - freemem_start);
- phys_alloc_set_minimum_alignment(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-
- phys_alloc_get_unused(&base, &top);
- base = PAGE_ALIGN(base);
- top = top & PAGE_MASK;
- assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || !(base >> 32));
- if (sizeof(long) != 8 && (top >> 32) != 0)
- top = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
- page_alloc_init_area(0, base >> PAGE_SHIFT, top >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- page_alloc_ops_enable();
+ mem_allocator_init(freemem_start, freemem->end);
}
static void freemem_push_fdt(void **freemem, const void *fdt)
@@ -292,7 +301,6 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
struct efi_boot_memmap *map = &(efi_bootinfo->mem_map);
efi_memory_desc_t *buffer = *map->map;
efi_memory_desc_t *d = NULL;
- phys_addr_t base, top;
struct mem_region r;
uintptr_t text = (uintptr_t)&_text, etext = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_etext, 4096);
uintptr_t data = (uintptr_t)&_data, edata = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_edata, 4096);
@@ -380,17 +388,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || free_mem_start < (3ul << 30));
- phys_alloc_init(free_mem_start, free_mem_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT);
- phys_alloc_set_minimum_alignment(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-
- phys_alloc_get_unused(&base, &top);
- base = PAGE_ALIGN(base);
- top = top & PAGE_MASK;
- assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || !(base >> 32));
- if (sizeof(long) != 8 && (top >> 32) != 0)
- top = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
- page_alloc_init_area(0, base >> PAGE_SHIFT, top >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- page_alloc_ops_enable();
+ mem_allocator_init(free_mem_start, free_mem_start + (free_mem_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT));
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 16:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/18] runtime: Update MAX_SMP probe Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 2:29 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/18] runtime: Add yet another 'no kernel' error message Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 2:39 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/18] arm64: efi: Don't create dummy test Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 3:37 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/18] arm64: efi: Make running tests on EFI can be parallel Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/18] arm64: efi: Remove redundant dtb generation Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/18] arm64: efi: Move run code into a function Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/18] arm64: efi: Remove EFI_USE_DTB Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/18] arm64: efi: Improve device tree discovery Andrew Jones
2024-03-25 16:24 ` Paluri, PavanKumar
2024-03-25 21:59 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-26 9:03 ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/18] lib/efi: Add support for loading the initrd Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/18] arm64: efi: Allow running tests directly Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/18] arm/arm64: Factor out some initial setup Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/18] arm64: Simplify efi_mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/18] arm64: Add memregions_efi_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/18] arm64: efi: Don't map reserved regions Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/18] arm64: efi: Fix _start returns from failed _relocate Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 17/18] arm64: efi: Switch to our own stack Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 18/18] arm64: efi: Add gitlab CI Andrew Jones
2024-03-18 16:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240305164623.379149-32-andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox