From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: alexandru.elisei@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nikos.nikoleris@arm.com, shahuang@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/18] arm64: Simplify efi_mem_init
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:46:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305164623.379149-33-andrew.jones@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305164623.379149-20-andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Reduce the EFI mem_map loop to only setting flags and finding the
largest free memory region. Then, apply memregions_split() for
the code/data region split (which requires ensuring _etext is
page aligned). Finally, do the rest of the things that used to be
done in the EFI mem_map loop in a separate mem_region loop.
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
---
arm/efi/elf_aarch64_efi.lds | 1 +
lib/arm/setup.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arm/efi/elf_aarch64_efi.lds b/arm/efi/elf_aarch64_efi.lds
index 836d98255d88..7a4192b77900 100644
--- a/arm/efi/elf_aarch64_efi.lds
+++ b/arm/efi/elf_aarch64_efi.lds
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SECTIONS
*(.rodata*)
. = ALIGN(16);
}
+ . = ALIGN(4096);
_etext = .;
_text_size = . - _text;
.dynamic : { *(.dynamic) }
diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
index 7f2043907634..b8c88b5bf011 100644
--- a/lib/arm/setup.c
+++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
@@ -301,9 +301,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
struct efi_boot_memmap *map = &(efi_bootinfo->mem_map);
efi_memory_desc_t *buffer = *map->map;
efi_memory_desc_t *d = NULL;
- struct mem_region r;
- uintptr_t text = (uintptr_t)&_text, etext = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_etext, 4096);
- uintptr_t data = (uintptr_t)&_data, edata = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_edata, 4096);
+ struct mem_region r, *code, *data;
const void *fdt = efi_bootinfo->fdt;
/*
@@ -337,21 +335,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
r.flags = MR_F_IO;
break;
case EFI_LOADER_CODE:
- if (r.start <= text && r.end > text) {
- /* This is the unit test region. Flag the code separately. */
- phys_addr_t tmp = r.end;
-
- assert(etext <= data);
- assert(edata <= r.end);
- r.flags = MR_F_CODE;
- r.end = data;
- memregions_add(&r);
- r.start = data;
- r.end = tmp;
- r.flags = 0;
- } else {
- r.flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
- }
+ r.flags = MR_F_CODE;
break;
case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
if (free_mem_pages < d->num_pages) {
@@ -361,15 +345,27 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
break;
}
- if (!(r.flags & MR_F_IO)) {
- if (r.start < __phys_offset)
- __phys_offset = r.start;
- if (r.end > __phys_end)
- __phys_end = r.end;
- }
memregions_add(&r);
}
+ memregions_split((unsigned long)&_etext, &code, &data);
+ assert(code && (code->flags & MR_F_CODE));
+ if (data)
+ data->flags &= ~MR_F_CODE;
+
+ for (struct mem_region *m = mem_regions; m->end; ++m) {
+ if (m != code && (m->flags & MR_F_CODE))
+ m->flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
+
+ if (!(m->flags & MR_F_IO)) {
+ if (m->start < __phys_offset)
+ __phys_offset = m->start;
+ if (m->end > __phys_end)
+ __phys_end = m->end;
+ }
+ }
+ __phys_end &= PHYS_MASK;
+
if (fdt) {
unsigned long old_start = free_mem_start;
void *freemem = (void *)free_mem_start;
@@ -380,7 +376,6 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
free_mem_pages = (free_mem_start - old_start) >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
}
- __phys_end &= PHYS_MASK;
asm_mmu_disable();
if (free_mem_pages == 0)
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 16:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/18] runtime: Update MAX_SMP probe Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 2:29 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/18] runtime: Add yet another 'no kernel' error message Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 2:39 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/18] arm64: efi: Don't create dummy test Andrew Jones
2024-03-07 3:37 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/18] arm64: efi: Make running tests on EFI can be parallel Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/18] arm64: efi: Remove redundant dtb generation Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/18] arm64: efi: Move run code into a function Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/18] arm64: efi: Remove EFI_USE_DTB Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/18] arm64: efi: Improve device tree discovery Andrew Jones
2024-03-25 16:24 ` Paluri, PavanKumar
2024-03-25 21:59 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-26 9:03 ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/18] lib/efi: Add support for loading the initrd Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/18] arm64: efi: Allow running tests directly Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/18] arm/arm64: Factor out some initial setup Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/18] arm/arm64: Factor out allocator init from mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/18] arm64: Add memregions_efi_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/18] arm64: efi: Don't map reserved regions Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/18] arm64: efi: Fix _start returns from failed _relocate Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 17/18] arm64: efi: Switch to our own stack Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 16:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 18/18] arm64: efi: Add gitlab CI Andrew Jones
2024-03-18 16:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240305164623.379149-33-andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox