From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/22] RISC-V: KVM: Support 64 bit firmware counters on RV32
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 14:10:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240405-6ef7f32d45deb5edd2d54ecb@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403080452.1007601-15-atishp@rivosinc.com>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:04:43AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> The SBI v2.0 introduced a fw_read_hi function to read 64 bit firmware
> counters for RV32 based systems.
>
> Add infrastructure to support that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 4 ++-
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c | 6 ++++
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> index 257f17641e00..55861b5d3382 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static_assert(RISCV_KVM_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64);
>
> struct kvm_fw_event {
> /* Current value of the event */
> - unsigned long value;
> + u64 value;
>
> /* Event monitoring status */
> bool started;
> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_ba
> struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_snapshot_set_shmem(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long saddr_low,
> unsigned long saddr_high, unsigned long flags,
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> index 9fedf9dc498b..ff326152eeff 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,36 @@ static int pmu_get_pmc_index(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, unsigned long eidx,
> return kvm_pmu_get_programmable_pmc_index(pmu, eidx, cbase, cmask);
> }
>
> +static int pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + unsigned long *out_val)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> + int fevent_code;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> + pr_warn("%s: should be invoked for only RV32\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (cidx >= kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu) || cidx == 1) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid counter id [%ld]during read\n", cidx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[cidx];
> +
> + if (pmc->cinfo.type != SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + fevent_code = get_event_code(pmc->event_idx);
> + pmc->counter_val = kvpmu->fw_event[fevent_code].value;
> +
> + *out_val = pmc->counter_val >> 32;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> unsigned long *out_val)
> {
> @@ -705,6 +735,18 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_ba
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(vcpu, cidx, &retdata->out_val);
> + if (ret == -EINVAL)
> + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> {
> @@ -778,7 +820,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> } else {
> pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> - pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
> index d3e7625fb2d2..cf111de51bdb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_pmu.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_pmu_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ:
> ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata);
> break;
> + case SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ_HI:
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> + ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_fw_ctr_read_hi(vcpu, cp->a0, retdata);
> + else
> + retdata->out_val = 0;
> + break;
> case SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM:
> ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_snapshot_set_shmem(vcpu, cp->a0, cp->a1, cp->a2, retdata);
> break;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 8:04 [PATCH v5 00/22] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] RISC-V: Fix the typo in Scountovf CSR name Atish Patra
2024-04-04 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] RISC-V: Add FIRMWARE_READ_HI definition Atish Patra
2024-04-04 10:57 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] drivers/perf: riscv: Read upper bits of a firmware counter Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:02 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 0:04 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] drivers/perf: riscv: Use BIT macro for shifting operations Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 0:20 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] RISC-V: Add SBI PMU snapshot definitions Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:14 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:52 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10 22:29 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-11 7:45 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-04 12:01 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 0:21 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] drivers/perf: riscv: Fix counter mask iteration for RV32 Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:55 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] RISC-V: KVM: Fix the initial sample period value Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:57 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] RISC-V: KVM: Rename the SBI_STA_SHMEM_DISABLE to a generic name Atish Patra
2024-04-04 11:59 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] RISC-V: KVM: No need to update the counter value during reset Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] RISC-V: KVM: No need to exit to the user space if perf event failed Atish Patra
2024-04-04 12:19 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] RISC-V: KVM: Implement SBI PMU Snapshot feature Atish Patra
2024-04-05 11:23 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 0:33 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] RISC-V: KVM: Add perf sampling support for guests Atish Patra
2024-04-05 11:36 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] RISC-V: KVM: Support 64 bit firmware counters on RV32 Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:10 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] RISC-V: KVM: Improve firmware counter read function Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:12 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Move sbi definitions to its own header file Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:16 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add helper functions for extension checks Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:17 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Sscofpmf to get-reg-list test Atish Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU extension definitions Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:20 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU selftest Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:50 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 0:37 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-09 8:01 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 22:11 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Atish Patra
2024-04-05 13:11 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 22:52 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10 7:10 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10 7:28 ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10 7:54 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for counter overflow Atish Patra
2024-04-05 13:23 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-09 23:47 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240405-6ef7f32d45deb5edd2d54ecb@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=akaher@vmware.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=amakhalov@vmware.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox