From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Zcmop
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:54:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240416-gave-apron-3234098ce416@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eda3278-24bc-4c17-a741-523ad5ff79f7@rivosinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4065 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:10:24AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
>
>
> On 11/04/2024 13:53, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> >>>> If we consider to have potentially broken isa string (ie extensions
> >>>> dependencies not correctly handled), then we'll need some way to
> >>>> validate this within the kernel.
> >>>
> >>> No, the DT passed to the kernel should be correct and we by and large we
> >>> should not have to do validation of it. What I meant above was writing
> >>> the binding so that something invalid will not pass dtbs_check.
> >>
> >> Acked, I was mainly answering Deepak question about dependencies wrt to
> >> using __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET() which does not seems to be relevant
> >> since we expect a correct isa string to be passed.
> >
> > Ahh, okay.
> >
> >> But as you stated, DT
> >> validation clearly make sense. I think a lot of extensions strings would
> >> benefit such support (All the Zv* depends on V, etc).
> >
> > I think it is actually as simple something like this, which makes it
> > invalid to have "d" without "f":
> >
> > | diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> > | index 468c646247aa..594828700cbe 100644
> > | --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> > | +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> > | @@ -484,5 +484,20 @@ properties:
> > | Registers in the AX45MP datasheet.
> > | https://www.andestech.com/wp-content/uploads/AX45MP-1C-Rev.-5.0.0-Datasheet.pdf
> > |
> > | +allOf:
> > | + - if:
> > | + properties:
> > | + riscv,isa-extensions:
> > | + contains:
> > | + const: "d"
> > | + not:
> > | + contains:
> > | + const: "f"
> > | + then:
> > | + properties:
> > | + riscv,isa-extensions:
> > | + false
> > | +
> > | +
> > | additionalProperties: true
> > | ...
> >
> > If you do have d without f, the checker will say:
> > cpu@2: riscv,isa-extensions: False schema does not allow ['i', 'm', 'a', 'd', 'c']
> >
> > At least that's readable, even though not clear about what to do. I wish
>
> That looks really readable indeed but the messages that result from
> errors are not so informative.
>
> It tried playing with various constructs and found this one to yield a
> comprehensive message:
>
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + riscv,isa-extensions:
> + contains:
> + const: zcf
> + not:
> + contains:
> + const: zca
> + then:
> + properties:
> + riscv,isa-extensions:
> + items:
> + anyOf:
> + - const: zca
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sun20i-d1-dongshan-nezha-stu.dtb: cpu@0:
> riscv,isa-extensions:10: 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> 'zca' was expected
> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/extensions.yaml
>
> Even though dt-bindings-check passed, not sure if this is totally a
> valid construct though...
I asked Rob about this yesterday, he suggested adding:
riscv,isa-extensions:
if:
contains:
const: zcf
then:
contains:
const: zca
to the existing property, not in an allOf. I think that is by far the
most readable version in terms of what goes into the binding. The output
would look like:
cpu@0: riscv,isa-extensions: ['i', 'm', 'a', 'd', 'c'] does not contain items matching the given schema
(for d requiring f cos I am lazy)
Also, his comment about your one that gives the nice message was that it
would wrong as the anyOf was pointless and it says all items must be
"zca". I didn't try it, but I have a feeling your nice output will be
rather less nice if several different deps are unmet - but hey, probably
will still be better than having an undocumented extension!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 9:10 [PATCH 00/10] Add support for a few Zc* extensions as well as Zcmop Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: riscv: add Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb ISA extension description Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] riscv: add ISA parsing for Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] riscv: hwprobe: export Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb ISA extensions Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] RISC-V: KVM: Allow Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb extensions for Guest/VM Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add some Zc* extensions to get-reg-list test Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] dt-bindings: riscv: add Zcmop ISA extension description Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Zcmop Clément Léger
2024-04-10 21:32 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-04-10 22:16 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-10 22:27 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-10 22:32 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-04-11 7:25 ` Clément Léger
2024-04-11 9:03 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-11 9:08 ` Clément Léger
2024-04-11 11:53 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-15 9:10 ` Clément Léger
2024-04-16 14:54 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-04-16 15:23 ` Clément Léger
2024-04-17 13:11 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-10 9:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] riscv: hwprobe: export Zcmop ISA extension Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] RISC-V: KVM: Allow Zcmop extension for Guest/VM Clément Léger
2024-04-10 9:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Zcmop extension to get-reg-list test Clément Léger
2024-04-10 21:34 ` [PATCH 00/10] Add support for a few Zc* extensions as well as Zcmop Deepak Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240416-gave-apron-3234098ce416@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox