From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Fei Li <fei1.li@intel.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] UAF in acrn_irqfd_assign() and vfio_virqfd_enable()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 06:12:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610051206.GD1629371@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607210814.GC1629371@ZenIV>
In acrn_irqfd_assign():
irqfd = kzalloc(sizeof(*irqfd), GFP_KERNEL);
...
set it up
...
mutex_lock(&vm->irqfds_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &vm->irqfds, list) {
if (irqfd->eventfd != tmp->eventfd)
continue;
ret = -EBUSY;
mutex_unlock(&vm->irqfds_lock);
goto fail;
}
list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &vm->irqfds);
mutex_unlock(&vm->irqfds_lock);
Now irqfd is visible in vm->irqfds.
/* Check the pending event in this stage */
events = vfs_poll(f.file, &irqfd->pt);
if (events & EPOLLIN)
acrn_irqfd_inject(irqfd);
OTOH, in
static int acrn_irqfd_deassign(struct acrn_vm *vm,
struct acrn_irqfd *args)
{
struct hsm_irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd);
if (IS_ERR(eventfd))
return PTR_ERR(eventfd);
mutex_lock(&vm->irqfds_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(irqfd, tmp, &vm->irqfds, list) {
if (irqfd->eventfd == eventfd) {
hsm_irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
and
static void hsm_irqfd_shutdown(struct hsm_irqfd *irqfd)
{
u64 cnt;
lockdep_assert_held(&irqfd->vm->irqfds_lock);
/* remove from wait queue */
list_del_init(&irqfd->list);
eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(irqfd->eventfd, &irqfd->wait, &cnt);
eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
kfree(irqfd);
}
Both acrn_irqfd_assign() and acrn_irqfd_deassign() are callable via
ioctl(2), with no serialization whatsoever. Suppose deassign hits
as soon as we'd inserted the damn thing into the list. By the
time we call vfs_poll() irqfd might have been freed. The same
can happen if hsm_irqfd_wakeup() gets called with EPOLLHUP as a key
(incidentally, it ought to do
__poll_t poll_bits = key_to_poll(key);
instead of
unsigned long poll_bits = (unsigned long)key;
and check for EPOLLIN and EPOLLHUP instead of POLLIN and POLLHUP).
AFAICS, that's a UAF...
We could move vfs_poll() under vm->irqfds_lock, but that smells
like asking for deadlocks ;-/
vfio_virqfd_enable() has the same problem, except that there we
definitely can't move vfs_poll() under the lock - it's a spinlock.
Could we move vfs_poll() + inject to _before_ making the thing
public? We'd need to delay POLLHUP handling there, but then
we need it until the moment with do inject anyway. Something
like replacing
if (!list_empty(&irqfd->list))
hsm_irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
in hsm_irqfd_shutdown_work() with
if (!list_empty(&irqfd->list))
hsm_irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
else
irqfd->need_shutdown = true;
and doing
if (unlikely(irqfd->need_shutdown))
hsm_irqfd_shutdown(irqfd);
else
list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &vm->irqfds);
when the sucker is made visible.
I'm *not* familiar with the area, though, so that might be unfeasible
for any number of reasons.
Suggestions?
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240607015656.GX1629371@ZenIV>
[not found] ` <20240607015957.2372428-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20240607015957.2372428-11-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20240607-gelacht-enkel-06a7c9b31d4e@brauner>
[not found] ` <20240607161043.GZ1629371@ZenIV>
[not found] ` <20240607210814.GC1629371@ZenIV>
2024-06-10 5:12 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-06-10 17:03 ` [RFC] UAF in acrn_irqfd_assign() and vfio_virqfd_enable() Al Viro
2024-06-10 20:09 ` Alex Williamson
2024-06-10 20:53 ` Al Viro
2024-06-11 23:04 ` Alex Williamson
2024-06-12 2:16 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240610051206.GD1629371@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=fei1.li@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox